Jump to content

Page:A Handbook of Phrenotypics for Teachers and Students (Beniowski).djvu/34

From Wikisource
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

28

HOW TO COMMIT TO MEMORY KNOWLEDGE BELONGING TO THE SECOND PHRENOTYPIC PROBLEM.

Returning back to our simile of the two boxes, I will now suppose that I take with my right hand one thousand cards, but with the left I take only a few. It is clear that there will be very little chance of having a card common to both hands; and at any rate the probability is here far less than in the case of my grasping with each hand one thousand cards. When I put before my mind a series of couples forming the 2nd phrenotypic problem, the probability of having a common phantom spring up is far less than in the first problem, and therefore I will proceed differently.

Suppose I had to commit to memory the following arbitrary vocabulary.

scopo bread
stireen water
lamono sofa,
&c. &c.

I will first put before my mind scopo alone: this makes rise before my mind the notion scope: this notion scope I will put simultaneously before my mind with bread, and immediately labour springs up thus—"The scope of labour is bread."

I put stireen alone: this excites the notion of stir in: I put stir in and water simultaneously,