Page:Crosby v Kelly (2012, FCAFC).pdf/2

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

- 2 -

Ex parte Barrett (1945) 70 CLR 141 followed

Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511 followed

Ruhani v Director of Police (2005) 222 CLR 489 followed

Spinks v Prentice (1999) 198 CLR 511 followed

Date of hearing: 2 July 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 47
Counsel for the Applicants: Dr GC Dempsey
Solicitor for the Applicants: Colquhoun Murphy
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr CJ Dibb
Solicitor for the Respondant: Zone Legal
Counsel for the Commonwealth Attorney-General: Mr TM Howe QC with Mr G Aiden
Solicitor for the Commonwealth Attorney-General: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Northern Territory Attorney-General: Mr MP Grant QC Solicitor-General for the Northern Territory with Mr RH Bruxner
Solicitor for the Northern Territory Attorney-General: Solicitor for the Northern Territory
Counsel for the Australian Capital Territory Attorney-General: Mr PJF Garrisson Solicitor-General for the Australian Capital Territory with Ms KM Richardson
Solicitor for the Australian Capital Attorney-General: ACT Government Solicitor