of the heathen, a movement which had already had an energetic
representative in the prophet himself. Heathenish cults and forbidden
manners and customs are a pollution to the land and a deep
insult to the true God. Therefore the duty of the believer is to
combat and destroy the unbeliever and the heretic. In short, the
tolerance of the Achaemenids and the indifference of the Arsacids
are now replaced by intolerance and religious persecution.
Such were the views in which Ardashir I. grew up, and in their energetic prosecution he found a potent instrument for the building up of his empire. It has previously been mentioned that Vologaeses III. had already begun a collection of the holy writings, and the task was resumed under Ardashir. At his order the orthodox doctrines and texts were compiled by the high priest Jansar, all divergent theories were prohibited and their adherents proscribed. Thus arose the Avesta, the sacred book of the Parsees. Above all, the sacred book of laws, the Vendidad, breathes throughout the spirit of the Sassanian period, in its intolerance, its casuistry degenerating into absurdity, and its soulless monotony. Subscription to the restored orthodox doctrine was to the Iranian a matter of course. The schismatics Ardashir imprisoned for a year; if, at its expiration, they still refused to listen to reason, and remained stiff necked, they were executed. It is even related that, in his zeal for uniformity of creed, Ardashir wished to extinguish the holy fires in the great cities of the empire and the Parthian vassal states, with the exception of that which burned in the residence of the dynasty. This plan he was unable to execute. In Armenia, also, Ardashir and Shapur, during the period of their occupation, sought to introduce the orthodox religion, destroyed the heathen images—even those of the Iranian gods which were here considered heathen,—and turned the shrines into fire-altars (Gelzer, Ber. sachs Ges. p. 135, 1895). Shapur I., who appears to have had a broader outlook, added to the religious writings a collection of scientific treatises on medicine, astronomy, mathematics, philosophy, zoology, &c., partly from Indian and Greek sources.
This religious development was most strongly influenced by the
fact that, meanwhile, a powerful opponent of Zoroastrianism had
arisen with an equally zealous propagandism and an
equal exclusiveness and intolerance. More especially
in the countries of the Tigris and Euphrates, now altogether
Aramaic, Christianity had everywhere gained a
Relation to Christianity.
Manichaeism.
firm footing.[1] But its missionary enterprise stretched over the whole
of Iran, and even farther. The time was come when, in the western
and eastern worlds alike, the religious question was for large masses
of people the most important question in life, and the diffusion
of their own creed and the suppression of all others the highest
and holiest of tasks. The man who thinks thus knows no compromise,
and so Zoroastrianism and Christianity confronted each
other as mortal enemies. Still the old idea that every religion
contained a portion of the truth, and that it was possible to borrow
something from one and amalgamate it with another, had not yet
lost all its power. From such a conception arose the teaching of
Mani or Manes. For Manichaeism (q.v.) is an attempt to weld the
doctrine of the Gospel and the doctrine of Zoroaster
into a uniform system, though naturally not without
an admixture of other elements, principally Babylonian
and Gnostic. Mani, perhaps a Persian from Babylonia, is said to
have made his first appearance as a teacher on the coronation
day of Shapur I. At all events he found numerous adherents,
both at court and among the magnates of the empire. The king
even inclined to him, till in a great disputation the Magians
gained the predominance. None the less Mani found means
to diffuse his creed far and wide over the whole empire. Even
the heir to the throne, Hormizd I. (reigned 272–273), was
favourably disposed to him; but Shapur’s younger son, Bahram I
(273–276), yielded to sacerdotal pressure, and Mani was executed.
After that Manichaeism was persecuted and extirpated in Iran.
Yet it maintained itself not merely in the west, where its head
resided at Babylon—propagating thence far into the Roman
Empire—but also in the east, in Khorasan and beyond the
bounds of the Sassanian dominion. There the seat of its pontiff
was at Samarkand; thence it penetrated into Central Asia,
where, buried in the desert sands which entomb the cities of
eastern Turkestan, numerous fragments of the works of Mani
and his disciples, in the Persian language (Pahlavi) and Syrian
script, and in an East Iranian dialect, called Sogdian, which was
used by the Manichaeans of Central Asia, have been discovered
(K. Müller, “Handschriftenreste in Estrangelo-schrift aus Turfan,
in Chinesisch-Turkestan,” in Abh. d. berl. Akad., 1904); among them
translations of texts of the New Testament (K. Müller, Berichte
der Berl., 1907, p. 260 seq). In these texts God the Father
is identified with the Zervan of Zarathustrism, the devil with
Ahriman. The further religious development of the Sassanid
Empire will be touched upon later.
Like the Arsacids the kings resided in Ctesiphon, where, out of
the vast palace built by Chosroes I., a portion at least of the great
hall is still erect. On the ruins of Seleucia, on the
opposite bank of the Tigris, Ardashir I. built the city
of Veh-Ardashir (“good is Ardashir”), to which the later an
kings added new towns, or rather new quarters. In Susiana
Architecture
and Arts.
Shapur I. built the great city of Gondev-Shapur, which succeeded
the ancient capital of the Persian Empire. At the same time the
mother-country again gained importance; especially the capital
of Persis, Istakhr, which had replaced the former Persepolis now
the ruins of Hajji-abad). Farther in the south-east, Ardashir I.
built Gur (now Firuzabad), under the name of Ardashir-khurre
(“the glory of Ardashir”). At these places and in Sarwistan,
near Shiraz and elsewhere, lie ruins of the Sassanid palaces, which
in their design go back to the Achaemenid architecture, blending
with it, however, Graeco-Syrian elements and serving in their turn
as models for the structures of the Caliphs (see Architecture:
§ Sassanian). After its long quiescence under the Arsacids native
art underwent a general renaissance, which, though not aspiring
to the Achaemenian creations, was still of no small importance.
Of the Sassanian rock-sculptures some have already been mentioned;
besides these, numerous engraved signet-stones have been preserved.
The metal-work, carpets and fabrics of this period enjoyed a high
reputation; they were widely distributed and even influenced
western art.
In the intellectual life and literature of the Sassanid era the main characteristic is the complete disappearance of Hellenism and the Greek language. Ardashir I. and Shapur I. still appended Greek translations to some of their inscriptions; but all of later date are drawn up in Pahlavi alone. The coins invariably bear a Pahlavi legend—on the obverse the king’s Literature. head with his name and title; on the reverse, a fire-altar (generally with the ascription “fire of Ardashir, Shapur, &c.,” i.e. the fire of the royal palace), and the name of the place of coinage, usually abbreviated. The real missionaries of culture in the empire were the Aramaeans (Syrians), who were connected with the West by their Christianity, and in their translations diffused Greek literature through the Orient. But there also developed a rather extensive Pahlavi literature, not limited to religious subjects, but containing works in belles lettres, modernizations of the old Iranian sagas and native traditions, e.g. the surviving fabulous history of Ardashir I., ethical tales, &c., with translations of foreign literature, principally Indian,—one instance being the celebrated book of tales Kalilah and Dimnah (see Syriac Literature), dating from Chosroes I., in whose reign chess also was introduced from India.
Authorities.-Side by side with the accounts of Roman and Greek authors stands the indigenous tradition which, especially for the later years of the empire, is generally trustworthy. It goes back to a native work, the Khudai nama (“book of lords”), compiled under Chosroes I. and continued to Yazdegerd III. Its narrations are principally preserved in Tabari, though there combined with numerous Arabian traditions; also in the poetical adaptation of Firdousi. To these may be added Syrian accounts, particularly in the martyrologies, which have been excellently treated by G. Hoffmann, Auszüge aus syrischen Akten persischer Märtyrer (1880); also the statements of the Armenian historians.
The fundamental work on Sassanian history is Theodor Nöldeke’s Gesch. der Perser u. Araber zur Zeit der Sassaniden, aus der arabischen Chronik des Tabari (1879, trans. with notes and excursuses chiefly on the chronology an organization of the empire). On this is based Nöldeke’s Aufsätze zur pers. Gesch. (1887; containing a history of the Sassanian Empire, pp. 86 sqq.) The only other works requiring mention are: G. Rawlinson, The Seventh Great Oriental Monarchy (1876), and F. Justi’s sketch in the Grundriss der iranischen Philologie, vol. ii. (1904). For the geography and numerous details of administration: J. Marquart, “Eranshahr” (Abh. d. götting. Ges. d. Wissensch., 1901). For the numismatology the works of A. D. Mordtmann are of prime importance, especially his articles in the Zeitschr. d. d. morgenl. Ges. (1879), xxxiii. 113 sqq. and xxxiv. 1 sqq. (1880), where the inscriptions of the individual kings are also enumerated. Also Nöldeke, ibid. xxxi. 147 sqq. (1877) For facsimiles of coins the principal work is J. de Bartholomaei, Collection de monnaies sassanides (2nd ed., St Petersburg, 1875). For the inscriptions: Edward Thomas, “Early Sassanian Inscriptions,” Journ. R. A. Soc. vol ii. (1868); West, “Pahlavi Literature” in the Grundriss d. iran. Philol. vol. ii. For the monuments: Flandin and Coste, Voyage en Perse (1851); Stolze, Persepolis (1882); Fr. Sarre, Iran. Felsreliefs a. d. Z. der Achaemeniden und Sassaniden (1908).
In foreign policy the problems under the Sassanid kings[2]
- ↑ For the propagation and history of the Christians in the Sassanid Empire, cf. Labourt, Le Christianisme dans l’empire perse sous la dynastie sassanide (1904); Harnack, Die Mission und Ausbreitung des Christenthums in den ersten drei Jahrhunderten, 2. Aufl. (1906), Bd. II. p. 121 seq.; Chabot, Synodicon orientale (1902) (a collection of the acts of the Nestorian synods held under the rule of the Sassanids).
- ↑ List of kings (after Nöldeke, Tabari, p. 435).
Ardashir I., 226–241. Yazdegerd II., 438–457. Shapur I., 241–272. Hormizd III., 457–459. Hormizd I., 272–273. Peroz, 457–484. Bahram I., 273–276. Balash, 484–488. Bahram II., 276–293. Kavadh I., 488–531. Bahram III., 293. (Djamasp, 496–498). Narseh (Narses), 293–302. Chosroes (Khosrau) I., Anushirvan, 531–579. Hormizd II, 302–310. Hormizd IV., 579–590. Shapur II., 310–379. Chosroes II., Parvez, 590–628. Ardashir II., 379–383. (Bahram VI., Cobin, Bistam 590–596.) Shapur III., 383–388. Kavadh II., Sheroe, 628. Bahram IV., 388–399. Ardashir III., 628–630. Yazdegerd I., 399–420. (Shahrbaraz, 630.) Bahram V., Gor. 420–438. (Boran and others, 630–632.) Yazdegerd III., 632–651. On most of these kings there are separate articles.