Jump to content

1959 Annual Typhoon Report/Section 4

From Wikisource

SECTION IV

DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION OF INITIAL DETECTION,

FORECAST TECHNIQUES EMPLOYED AND AIRCRAFT RECONNAISSANCE

A. DETECTION TECHNIQUES

Extremely important to the JTWC in detecting tropical cyclones in the formative stages of development were the surface and upper air reports from the Trust Territory Islands and Guam. The importance of these reports can be readily understood since, during the 1959 Typhoon Season, 13 of a total of 17 typhoons were first detected in the area. of the Trust Territory Islands. The Trust Territory Island reporting stations are shown on page 29. During the Typhoon Season very careful analyses were made of the area encompassing the Trust Territory Islands, both for the surface and upper air levels. These detailed analyses often gave the first indications of a tropical cyclone in the initial stages of development. Also, very valuable tools in first detecting tropical cyclone development were the Stidd Diagram and Time Cross-section of the Winds Aloft. A Stidd Diagram, an example of which is shown on page 30, is maintained continuously throughout the year, and includes all of the Trust Territory Islands transmitting surface reports. Time Cross-sections of the Winds Aloft, one of which is included on page 31, are also continuously maintained on all Trust Territory Island stations taking RAWIN or PIBAL observations. Weather Observations from the Vulture Lima reconnaissance track (shown on page 29), ship reports, and reports from scheduled and unscheduled aircraft also provided additional information from which the initial formation of tropical cyclones could first be detected. Normally, during the Typhoon Season, the Vulture Lima track was flown at least every other day.

As soon as indications pointed to the development of a tropical cyclone, a reconnaissance aircraft was dispatched to the suspect area to confirm or deny the existence of a closed circulation on the surface. During the 1959 Typhoon Season, there were very few instances in which tropical cyclone warnings were issued prior to a reconnaissance aircraft confirming the existence of a closed surface circulation. It can be stated, without equivocation, that the existence of 95 percent of 1959 typhoons, tropical storms and depressions could not initially have been confirmed without aircraft reconnaissance. This is due to the sparsity of reporting stations in the tropical cyclone spawning area to the southeast of Guam.

B. FORECAST TECHNIQUES

For ease of operation in preparing tropical cyclone warnings, a basic chart plus three acetate overlays were used by the Typhoon Duty Officers. All reconnaissance and radar fixes were plotted on the basic chart. Forecast positions were plotted on the bottom overlay, warning positions on the second overlay, and the top overlay was utilized as a work sheet.

Once the existence of a tropical cyclone was confirmed, a track, based on climatology and the forecast high level flow, was projected forward on the work sheet through the recurvature point (if applicable). This long range forecast track was used as a guide, and was continually modified based on reconnaissance and changes in the upper air pattern.

Normally, a reconnaissance fix on all typhoons was received approximately two hours before each warning was issued. Each fix was carefully evaluated by the Typhoon Duty Officer in terms of the type of fix, the reported accuracy of navigation, and the basis of navigation. Each fix was also evaluated in terms of previous fixes, the best track to date, and the high level flow. In preparing warnings, particular care was exercised not to be unduly influenced by short period fix to fix trends. Typhoons appear to have minor oscilations in movement, but it has been observed, in most instances, that the underlying or basic track is a straight line or smooth curve.

Warnings were based largely upon the information contained in completed Warning Forecast Worksheets, an example of which is included on page 32. Some of the more important features of the Warning Forecast Worksheet are:

1. Twenty-four hour forecast by Malone: Malone is an objective method of forecasting hurricane movement developed under the supervision of Doctor T. F. Malone of the Travelers Weather Research Center, Hartford, Connecticut. The method was adopted directly for forecasting typhoon movement in the Pacific. Since the method is based on the climatology of Atlantic hurricanes, it undoubtedly is not completely valid for forecasting typhoon movement. The JTWC computed typhoon movement using this method throughout the 1959 Typhoon Season, and found the forecasts to be 30 percent less accurate than the forecasts contained in the warnings prepared by the JTWC.
2. Speed of movement computations: The speeds between the last evaluated fix and the past five warnings positions were computed. Likewise, the speeds between the last warning position and the previous four warning positions are completed. One advantage of this procedure is that acceleration and deceleration can be readily detected.
3. Upper air discussion: A somewhat detailed discussion of the high level flow, and its possible steering effects on the tropical cyclone, has proven very useful. The JTWC Typhoon Duty Officers are of the opinion that fully developed typhoons are usually (except during strong polar outbreaks) steered by the flow above the highest closed contour around the typhoon. Generally, the best steering flow has been found to be at the 200 or 150 millibar level. High level movement and intensity trends of the semi-permanent Pacific subtropical high were observed to be important indicies with regard to the recurvature of typhoons. Post-analysis of the 1959 Typhoon Season has indicated that splitting of the subtropical high or ridge by eastward moving major troughs, and advective temperature effects on the intensity of the high or ridge, were invariably the determining factors as to when and where a typhoon would recurve. However, the complete lack of upper air data in the area of most frequent recurvature (the rectangle formed by Guam, Iwo-Jima, Taiwan and Clark Air Base) often precluded an accurate analysis in this critical area. For this reason, it is believed that forecasting typhoon recurvature will continue to be one of the major forecasting problems facing the JTWC.

It is appropriate to mention that typhoon forecasts provided by Tokyo Weather Central proved very useful. These forecasts, prepared using the space-mean technique, were transmitted to the JTWC twice daily whenever a typhoon had reached approximately 20 degrees north. In event the forecast differed significantly from that prepared by the JTWC, coordination was effected by radiotelephone.

Forecast error data for the 1959 Typhoon Season has been compiled and is included on page 33. The following "ground rules" were used for verifying forecasts: Forecasts were verified only when the cyclone was of tropical or typhoon intensity, and no forecasts were verified when the actual position of the storm or typhoon was north of 35 degrees.

C. AIRCRAFT WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE

The tropical cyclone reconnaissance provided by the 54th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron during the 1959 Typhoon Season was outstanding. The cooperation of the commander, Lieutenant Colonel Dale D. Desper, and his entire organization was commendable. The spirit of cooperation which existed between the 54th Reconnaissance Squadron and the Fleet Weather Central/Joint Typhoon Warning Center is perhaps the major factor which contributed to the effectiveness of this joint organization during its first year of operation. Perusal of the chart on page 34 clearly shows that during the 1959 Typhoon Season the 54th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron efficiently discharged its assigned responsibility for typhoon reconnaissance in the Western Pacific. It should be noted that 98 percent of all fixes requested by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center were made.

Additional units of the Air Force and Navy also provided the Joint Typhoon Warning Center with typhoon fixes which proved to be of invaluable assistance. The 56th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron made 21 fixes on diversions from fixed tracks; the 11th and 12th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadrons made 54 radar fixes; Navy BARPAC aircraft made 3 fixes on Typhoon PATSY; and an aircraft of Navy VW-3 Squadron made 3 fixes on Typhoon HARRIET.

The method used by the 54th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron where-in typhoons were penetrated at the 700 millibar level was found to be completely satisfactory. Occasional penetrations at the 500 millibar level were found to be less reliable for several reasons: (1) Difficulty was encountered in locating the eye. (2) Cloud cover often made it impossible to observe the surface, thus precluding a determination of the wind speed in the immediate vicinity of the typhoon center. (3) When observed, estimates of surface wind speeds tended to be less; accurate than those made at the 700 millibar level.

There appears to be a high degree of correlation between the maximum wind speed reported by reconnaissance at the 700 millibar level in the vicinity of a fully developed typhoon and the maximum reported surface wind speed. In most cases, the maximum surface wind speed appears to be approximately 15 to 25 percent higher than the wind speed at the 700 millibar level. However, the foregoing statements are based on an incomplete investigation, and a more detailed study will be undertaken during the coming months, if a definite correlation can be established, a marked improvement should result in the accuracy of existing maximum wind speeds, as reported in issued typhoon warnings. It should be mentioned that the flight level wind measuring equipment, with which B-50 weather reconnaissance aircraft are now equipped, is extremely accurate. Winds measured with this equipment (APN/82, Doppler Navigation Equipment) are generally accurate to plus or minus one degree in direction, and plus or minus 5 knots in speed.

WARNING FORECAST WORKSHEET

(TD) (TS) (TYPHOON):

TDO:

BEST TRACK (FAST 24 HOURS): Deg.

4. UPPER AIR DISCUSSION: (8 lines on actual form)

5. SURFACE DISCUSSION: (3 lines on actual form)

6. INDICATIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OR WEAKENING:

7. FINAL ASSESSMENT: (6 lines on actual form)

8. FORECAST MOVEMENT: #**1ST 12HRS **12-24HRS **1ST 24HRS 24-48HRS

Deg/Kts:

  • Time of past posits in chronological order.
    • _ Use as applicable.

TYPHOON


12 HR FORECASTS

NO. OF MEAN

CASES ERROR

(NM)


24 HR FORECASTS

NO. OF MEAN

CASES ERROR

(NM)


48 HR FORECASTS

NO. OF MEAN

CASES ERROR

(NM)


TILDA

BILLIE

ELLEN

GEORGIA

IRIS

JOAN

LOUISE

PATSY

SARAH

VERA

AMY

CHARLOTTE

DINAH

EMMA

FREDA

GILDA

HARRIET


34

16

24

9

11

22

17

16

20

17

13

34

27

27

27

30

35


43.9

64.1

74.7

122.3

47.5

57.1

46.8

113.4

43.8

42.5

78.1

48.0

50.1

69.1

41.9

35.1

46.5


32

15

23

7

9

20

16

14

18

15

11

32

25

25

25

29

33


94.6

106.4

158.8

236.0

123.8

105.7

114.6

205.6

105.4

87.3

176.8

98.6

97.7

149.4

97.8

74.9

100.9


NONE

13

19

3

5

16

16

4

14

11

7

28

21

21

21

25

29


MADE

247.9

290.8

596.0

309.4

228.6

290.8

360.8

269.7

160.8

355.6

310.3

231.0

335.7

166.5

178.2

272.2



AVERAGE ERROR - 12 HR FORECASTS (379 CASES) . . . . . . . 55.6
AVERAGE ERROR - 24 HR FORECASTS (349 CASES) . . . . . . . 155.5
AVERAGE ERROR - 48 HR FORECASTS (253 CASES) . . . . . . . 262.1

54TH WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON TYPHOON DATA

TYPHOON MISSIONS
FLOWN
TOTAL
OBS.
TOTAL
DROPS
FIXES
REQUESTED
FIXES
MADE
PENET
FIXES
OTHER
FIXES*
TILDA 14 313 17 35 32 25 7
10 205 21 13 12 9 3
ELLEN 13 262 33 22 21 18 4
GEORGIA 5 88 11 7 7 5 2
IRIS 6 110 18 10 10 10 3
JOAN 9 170 27 17 17 15 5
LOUISE 10 149 22 18 17 13 5
PATSY 4 85 13 4 4 4 0
SARAH 11 200 28 20 20 15 8
VERA 10 159 29 18 17 13 4
AMY 12 218 32 15 15 11 5
CHARLOTTE 22 386 57 44 44 28 16
DINAH 19 228 31 30 30 19 11
EMMA 22 349 64 36 36 27 9
FREDA 12 215 30 23 23 17 6
GILDA 16 277 42 36 36 23 10
HARRIET 20 385 36 43 41 28 15
TOTAL 215 3799 511 391 382 280 113
  • Radar or Triangulation Fixes