Berger v. New York

←

Berger v. New York
the Supreme Court of the United States

Syllabus

→

Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (1967) was a United States Supreme Court decision invalidating a New York law under the Fourth Amendment, because the statute authorized electronic eavesdropping without required procedural safeguards.

931132Berger v. New York — Syllabusthe Supreme Court of the United States

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

Concurring Opinions: Douglas; Stewart

Dissenting Opinions: Black; Harlan; White

Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

388 U.S. 41

Berger v. New York

Argued: April 13, 1967. --- Decided: June 12, 1967

Showing of exigent circumstances is more important in obtaining eavesdropping permit than when conventional procedures of search and seizure are utilized. U.S.C.A.Const. Amends. 4, 14. Id.m

[Syllabus from pages 41-42 intentionally omitted]

Joseph E. Brill, New York City, for petitioner.

H. Richard Uviller, New York City, for respondent.

Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

Berger v. New York

Notes

Navigation menu

Search