Jump to content

Adams v. Illinois

From Wikisource
Adams v. Illinois (1972)
Syllabus
4440329Adams v. Illinois — Syllabus1972
Court Documents
Concurring Opinions
Burger
Blackmun
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas

Supreme Court of the United States

405 U.S. 278

Adams  v.  Illinois

Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois

No. 70-5038  Argued: December 7, 1971 --- Decided: March 6, 1972

Petitioner's pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment against him because of the court's failure to appoint counsel to represent him at the preliminary hearing in 1967 was denied, and petitioner was tried and convicted. The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed on the ground that Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, in which this Court held that a preliminary hearing is a critical stage of the criminal process at which the accused is constitutionally entitled to assistance of counsel, did not have retroactive application.

Held: The judgment is affirmed. Pp. 280-286.

46 Ill. 2d 200, 263 N.E. 2d 490, affirmed.


MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, joined by MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concluded that Coleman v. Alabama, supra, does not apply retroactively to preliminary hearings conducted before June 22, 1970, when Coleman was decided. Pp. 280-285.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER concurred in the result, concluding, as set forth in his dissent in Coleman, that there is no constitutional requirement that counsel should be provided at preliminary hearings. Pp. 285-286.

MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN concurred in the result, concluding that Coleman was wrongly decided. P. 286.


BRENNAN, J., announced the Court's judgment and delivered an opinion, in which STEWART and WHITE, JJ., joined. BURGER, C.J., filed an opinion concurring in the result, post, p. 285. BLACKMUN, J., filed a statement concurring in the result, post, p. 286. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined, post, p. 286. POWELL and REHNQUIST, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.


Edward M. Genson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Charles B. Evins, Eugene Pincham, and Sam Adam.

E. James Gildea argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, Joel M. Flaum, First Assistant Attorney General, and James B. Zagel and James R. Streicker, Assistant Attorneys General.