Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VI/Arnobius/Adversus Gentes/Book III/Chapter VII
7. But why should I say that men seek from him subtleties of expression and splendour of diction, when I know that there are many who avoid and flee from his books on this subject, and will not hear his opinions read,[1] overthrowing their prejudices; and when I hear others muttering angrily, and saying that the senate should decree the destruction[2] of these writings by which the Christian religion is maintained, and the weight of antiquity overborne? But, indeed, if you are convinced that anything you say regarding your gods is beyond doubt, point out Cicero’s error, refute, rebut his rash and impious words,[3] and show that they are so. For when you would carry off writings, and suppress a book given forth to the public, you are not defending the gods, but dreading the evidence of the truth.
Footnotes
[edit]- ↑ Lit., “are unwilling to admit into their ear the reading of opinions,” etc.
- ↑ Both Christians and heathen, it is probable, were concerned in the mutilation of de Nat. Deorum.
- ↑ So Gelenius, reading dicta for the ms. dictitare. The last verb is comprobate, read reprobate—“condemn,” by all edd. except Hild. and Oehler.