Jump to content

Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VI/Methodius/Banquet of the Ten Virgins/Procilla/Part 5

From Wikisource
Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Banquet of the Ten Virgins, Procilla
by Methodius, translated by William R. Clark
Part 5
158583Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Banquet of the Ten Virgins, Procilla — Part 5William R. ClarkMethodius

Chapter V.—The Sixty Queens: Why Sixty, and Why Queens; The Excellence of the Saints of the First Age.

In addition to these matters, there is this also to be considered, so that nothing may escape us of things which are necessary, why He said that the queens were sixty, and the concubines eighty, and the virgins so numerous as not to be counted from their multitude, but the spouse one. And first let us speak of the sixty. I imagine that He named under the sixty queens, those who had pleased God from the first-made man in succession to Noah, for this reason, since these had no need of precepts and laws for their salvation, the creation of the world in six days being still recent. For they remembered that in six days God formed the creation, and those things which were made in paradise; and how man, receiving a command not to touch[1] the tree of knowledge, ran aground, the author of evil having led him astray.[2] Thence he gave the symbolical name of sixty queens to those souls who, from the creation of the world, in succession chose God as the object of their love, and were almost, so to speak, the offspring of the first age, and neighbours of the great six days’ work, from their having been born, as I said, immediately after the six days. For these had great honour, being associated with the angels, and often seeing God manifested visibly, and not in a dream. For consider what confidence Seth had towards God, and Abel, and Enos, and Enoch, and Methuselah, and Noah, the first lovers of righteousness, and the first of the first-born children who are written in heaven,[3] being thought worthy of the kingdom, as a kind of first-fruits of the plants for salvation, coming out as early fruit to God. And so much may suffice concerning these.


Footnotes

[edit]
  1. This was Eve’s testimony to the serpent, not the original command.—Tr. [But I do not see the force of this note. Eve in her innocency is surely a competent witness.]
  2. Gen. iii. 3.
  3. Heb. xi. 23.