Jump to content

Armstrong Paint Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corporation

From Wikisource


Armstrong Paint Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corporation
by Stanley Forman Reed
Syllabus
891011Armstrong Paint Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corporation — SyllabusStanley Forman Reed
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

305 U.S. 315

Armstrong Paint Varnish Works  v.  Nu-Enamel Corporation

 Argued: Nov. 7-8, 1938. --- Decided: Dec 5, 1938

[Syllabus from pages 315-317 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Moses Levitan, George I. Haight, and George A. Carpenter, all of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

[Argument of Counsel from Pages 317-318 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Edward S. Rogers, of Chicago, Ill., for respondents.

[Argument of Counsel from Pages 318-319 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse