Jump to content

B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc./Concurrence Ginsburg

From Wikisource
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2015)
Concurring opinion by Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Cite as: B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., 575 U.S. 138, 160 (2015) (Ginsburg, J., concurring).

4397645B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2015) — Concurring opinionRuth Bader Ginsburg
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Ginsburg
Dissenting Opinion
Thomas

JUSTICE GINSBURG, concurring.

The Court rightly recognizes that "for a great many registration decisions issue preclusion obviously will not apply." Ante, at 153. That is so because contested registrations [p161] are often decided upon "a comparison of the marks in the abstract and apart from their marketplace usage." 6 J. McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 32:101, p. 32-247 (4th ed. 2014). When the registration proceeding is of that character, "there will be no [preclusion] of the likel[ihood] of confusion issue . . . in a later infringement suit." Ibid. On that understanding, I join the Court's opinion.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse