Jump to content

Bath Chronicle and Herald/1934/Sir Harold Brakspear dies at Bath

From Wikisource
Sir Harold Brakspear dies at Bath (1934)

Bath Chronicle and Herald, Saturday, November 24, 1934; pg. 26; Issue 9046

2023508Sir Harold Brakspear dies at Bath1934

Sir Harold Brakspear dies at Bath

FAMOUS CHURCH ARCHITECT

RESTORER OF ST. GEORGE'S CHURCH, WINDSOR

RESIDENT OF CORSHAM

We deeply regret to announce that Sir Harold Brakspear, K.C.V.O., F.S.A., F.R.I.B.A., the distinguished Wiltshire architect, whose home was at Pickwick Manor, Corsham, died on Tuesday evening in a Bath nursing home after an illness of about a month's duration. Since Sunday the daily bulletin regarding Sir Harold's condition had been less reassuring, and Lady Brakspear had spent nearly all her time in devotedly watching at his bedside.

Sir Harold, who was 64, was the youngest son of the late Mr. William Hayward Brakspear, of Sale Bank, Cheshire. He was educated privately, and qualified as an architect by the examination of the Royal Institute of the British Architects in 1892. He was chiefly engaged in the restoration of old buildings, and his most famous achievement was the restoration of St. George's Chapel, Windsor. For this work, he was created a Knight Commander of the Royal Victorian Order.

COMMERATIVE SERVICE.

On Wednesday, November 4th, 1930, there was a brilliant scene in this chapel, which was aptly styled "The Shrine of Chivalry," when the King and Queen attended a service in celebration of the restoration.

The King was present as Sovereign of the Order of the Garter. The Prince of Wales, the Duke of York, Prince George, Prince Arthur of Connaught, and other Kings of the Garter were present, as were the Military Knights of Windsor.

Sir Harold had a seat near the Knights of the Garter at this service, and Lady Brakspear was also present.

In the last sentence of his final report on this work to the Canon of Windsor, Sir Harold stated: "It is no exaggeration to say that at no time in its history has the structure of St. George's Chapel been so secure as at the present.:"

No tribute to the skill of Sir Harold, said the Canon, can be too high.

The restoration cost a quarter of a million, and Bath stone was employed. As a result of Sir Harold's work, the "King's Beasts" were restored to the pinnacles after an absence of 250 years.

CHURCH RESTORER.

Sir Harold's architectural work had gained him fame all over the country He restored Battle Abbey, near Pevensey, Sussex, associated with the landing of William the Conqueror, after the fire there several years ago.

He was also associated with the restoration of Workshop Prioirym Nuneaton Priory, Ludlow Church, and St. Worlos, Newport.

The mansions which he restored were Great Chalfield, Lacock Abbey, Hazelbury, Little Sidbury, and Sherborne Castle.

Sir Harold was also responsible for the restoration work at Malmesbury Abbey, and for the enrichments at the east end of Bath Abbey.

Besides being consulting architect to the Dean and Canons of Windsor, Sir Harold was consulting architect to the Dean and Canons of Worcester.

ARCHÆOLOGICAL AUTHORITY.

Sir Harold was a great authority on the archæology of Wiltshire, and on several occasions acted as guide to various architectural associations when they visited Bath and district. He fulfilled this duty in 1929, when the Royal Institute of British Architects made Bath the centre of a series of summer excursions, personally conducting the visitors over Lacock Abbey.

During the summer of 1930, Sir Harold acted as guide to the Royal Archæological Institute when they spent a week in Bath, and wrote the official descriptions for the tours into Wiltshire.

He was the author of many papers in various archæological journals.

In 1908, Sir Harold married Lilian, youngest daughter of Mr. Walter Somers, J.P., of Halesowen, Worcestershire.

There is a family of two—a son, Mr. Oswald Brakspear, who is a student of the Faculty of Architecture at Bristol University, and a daughter, Miss Mary Braspear.

Sir Harold underwent an operation in Bath some weeks ago.

This work is anonymous or pseudonymous, and is in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date (January 1, 1996 for most countries). It is also in the public domain in other countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 89 years or less since publication.


This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse