Jump to content

Beers v. Arkansas

From Wikisource


Beers v. Arkansas, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 527 (1858)
the Supreme Court of the United States
705907Beers v. Arkansas, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 527 (1858)1858the Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States

61 U.S. 527

JOSEPH D. BEERS, USE OF WILLIAM A. PLATENIUS, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF JAMES HOLFORD, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR  v.  THE STATE OF ARKANSAS

Writ of Error to the Supreme Court of Arkansas

Court Documents

Under the Constitution of the State of Arkansas, the Legislature passed a law allowing the State to be sued.

According to this law, a suit was brought upon some of the State bonds; and whilst the suit was going on, the Legislature passed another law, requiring the bonds to be filed in court, or the suit to be dismissed.

The suitor refusing to file his bonds, the suit was dismissed; and the case was carried to the Supreme Court of the State, where the judgment was affirmed.

The case, being brought to this court under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

The permission to bring the suit was not a contract whose obligations were impaired by the passage of the subsequent law.

[p528] THESE three[1] cases depended upon the same principle, and are therefore classed together. The report in the first-named case will apply to them all. It was a case which was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas, by a writ of error, issued under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act.

The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

It was argued by Mr. Pike for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Hempstead for the defendant.


1.   [Together with two additional cases styled William A. Platenius, Administrator of James Holford, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Arkansas.]

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).

A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse