Jump to content

Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Company of America/Concurrence Harlan

From Wikisource
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Frankfurter
Harlan
Dissenting Opinion
Burton

United States Supreme Court

350 U.S. 198

Bernhardt  v.  Polygraphic Company of America

 Argued: Dec. 5, 1955. --- Decided: Jan 16, 1956


Mr. Justice HARLAN, concurring.

I concur in the opinion of the Court except insofar as it undertakes to review and affirm the District Court's interpretation of Vermont law. I agree with Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER that the review of questions of state law should ordinarily be left to the Courts of Appeals and would remand the case to the Court of Appeals for that purpose.

Mr. Justice BURTON, dissenting.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse