Binderup v. Pathe Exchange
Appearance
United States Supreme Court
Binderup v. Pathe Exchange
Argued: Oct. 16, 1923. --- Decided: Nov 19, 1923
Mr. Dana B. Van Dusen, of Omaha, Neb., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 292-294 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Wm. M. Seabury, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Arthur F. Mullen, of Omaha, Neb., for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 295-301 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.
Notes
[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse