Jump to content

Binderup v. Pathe Exchange

From Wikisource


Binderup v. Pathe Exchange
George Sutherland
Syllabus
868999Binderup v. Pathe Exchange — SyllabusGeorge Sutherland
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

263 U.S. 291

Binderup  v.  Pathe Exchange

 Argued: Oct. 16, 1923. --- Decided: Nov 19, 1923

Mr. Dana B. Van Dusen, of Omaha, Neb., for plaintiff in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 292-294 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Wm. M. Seabury, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Arthur F. Mullen, of Omaha, Neb., for defendants in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 295-301 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse