Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Company

←

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Company
George Sutherland

Syllabus

→

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action. Warning: template has been deprecated.

888043Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Company — SyllabusGeorge Sutherland

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

299 U.S. 65

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Company

Argued: Oct. 12, 1936. --- Decided: Nov 9, 1936

Messrs. Archibald B. Dorman and Jefferson P. Chandler, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Mr. Herbert W. Clark, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondents.

Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse