Jump to content

Bradley v. United States (104 U.S. 442)/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
748711Bradley v. United States (104 U.S. 442) — Opinion of the CourtMorrison Waite

United States Supreme Court

104 U.S. 442

Bradley  v.  United States


Sect. 1079 of the Revised Statutes provides that no claimant suing the United States in the Court of Claims, nor any person from or through whom such claimant derives his alleged title, claim, or right, nor any person interested in any such title, claim, or right, shall be a competent witness in supporting the same, but under sect. 1080 the United States may make a claimant a witness.

We a ree with the court below that this does not prevent the United States from using as a witness to defeat the claim one whose interest is adverse to the claimant, and that, too, when a judgment in favor of the United States may have the effect of establishing the right of the witness to the same claim.

The objections urged against the competency of the witness under the provisions of sect. 858 of the Revised Statutes are disposed of by Potter v. National Bank, 102 U.S. 163.

Judgment affirmed.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse