Jump to content

Brennan v. Arnheim and Neely, Inc.

From Wikisource
Brennan v. Arnheim and Neely, Inc. (1973)
Syllabus
4765959Brennan v. Arnheim and Neely, Inc. — Syllabus1973
Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
White

Supreme Court of the United States

410 U.S. 512

Brennan, Secretary of Labor  v.  Arnheim & Neely, Inc., et al.

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

No. 71-1598.  Argued: January 16, 1973 --- Decided: February 28, 1973

Respondent company, a fully integrated real estate management concern directing from its central office manifold operations at nine separately owned buildings, including leasing the properties for the owners and hiring, firing, supervising, and negotiating the wages of those employed in the buildings, held to be an "enterprise" within the meaning of § 3 (r) of the Fair Labor Standards Act since respondent conducts related activities through unified operation or control, for a common business purpose. It is irrelevant, for purposes of defining the respondent's enterprise under § 3 (r), that the building owners, who are not defendants in this enforcement action under the Act, have no relationship with one another and no common business purpose, since their activities as employers are not at issue here. Pp. 516-521.

444 F.2d 609, reversed and remanded.


STEWART, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. WHITE, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 521.


Andrew L. Frey argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold and Richard F. Schubert.

Eugene B. Strassburger, Jr., argued the cause for respondent Arnheim & Neely, Inc. Frank L. Seamans argued the cause for respondent Institute of Real Estate Management. With them on the brief were Eugene B. Strassburger III and Robert P. Lawry.[1]

Notes

[edit]
  1. Howard Lichtenstein and Marvin Dicker filed a brief for the Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations, Inc., as amicus curiae urging affirmance.