Jump to content

Brooks v. Tennessee

From Wikisource
Brooks v. Tennessee (1972)
Syllabus
4573378Brooks v. Tennessee — Syllabus1972
Court Documents

Supreme Court of the United States

406 U.S. 605

Brooks  v.  Tennessee

Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

No. 71-5313.  Argued: March 21-22, 1972 --- Decided: June 7, 1972

1. Tennessee's statutory requirement that a defendant in a criminal proceeding "desiring to testify shall do so before any other testimony for the defense is heard by the court trying the case" violates the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination. A defendant may not be penalized for remaining silent at the close of the State's case by being excluded from the stand later in the trial. Pp. 607-612.

2. The Tennessee rule also infringes the defendant's constitutional rights by depriving him of the "guiding hand of counsel," in deciding not only whether the defendant will testify but, if so, at what stage. Pp. 612-613.

— Tenn. App. —, — S.W. 2d —, reversed and remanded.


BRENNAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which DOUGLAS, WHITE, MARSHALL, and POWELL, JJ., joined. STEWART, J., filed a statement concurring in the judgment and in Part II of the Court's opinion, post, p. 613. BURGER, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BLACKMUN and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined, post, p. 613. REHNQUIST, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BURGER, C. J., and BLACKMUN, J., joined, post, p. 617.


Jerry H. Summers argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Robert E. Kendrick, Deputy Attorney General of Tennessee, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.