Jump to content

Carlos v. New York/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Carlos v. New York
Opinion of the Court
935837Carlos v. New York — Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

396 U.S. 119

Carlos  v.  New York


The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767, 87 S.Ct. 1414, 18 L.Ed.2d 515.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice HARLAN are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in Mr. Justice HARLAN's separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in A Book Named 'John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Com. of Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, 86 S.Ct. 975, 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (1966).

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse