Jump to content

Cash v. Maxwell

From Wikisource
Cash v. Maxwell
the Supreme Court of the United States

Order (slip opinion - see disclaimer)

1224586Cash v. Maxwellthe Supreme Court of the United States
Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
Scalia
Statement
Sotomayor

Cite as: 565 U.S. ____ (2012)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

BRENDA CASH, ACTING WARDEN v. BOBBY JOE MAXWELL

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 10–1548. Decided January 9, 2012

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.



The current edition of this document derives from the electronic version of the "slip opinion" posted online by the Supreme Court of the United States the day the decision was handed down. It is not the final or most authoritative version. It is subject to further revision by the Court and should be replaced with the final edition when it is published in a print volume of the United States Reports. The Court's full disclaimer regarding slip opinions follows:
The "slip" opinion is the second version of an opinion. It is sent to the printer later in the day on which the "bench" opinion is released by the Court. Each slip opinion has the same elements as the bench opinion—majority or plurality opinion, concurrences or dissents, and a prefatory syllabus—but may contain corrections not appearing in the bench opinion.
Caution: These electronic opinions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official printed slip opinion pamphlets. Moreover, a slip opinion is replaced within a few months by a paginated version of the case in the preliminary print, and—one year after the issuance of that print—by the final version of the case in a U. S. Reports bound volume. In case of discrepancies between the print and electronic versions of a slip opinion, the print version controls. In case of discrepancies between the slip opinion and any later official version of the opinion, the later version controls. (source: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx)

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse