Champlin Refining Company v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Champlin Refining Company v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma
Syllabus
882844Champlin Refining Company v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma — Syllabus
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

286 U.S. 210

Champlin Refining Company  v.  Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

 Argued: March 23, 1932. --- Decided: May 16, 1932

[Syllabus from pages 210-212 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Harry O. Glasser, of Enid, Okl., James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., and George S. Ramsey, of Tulsa, Okl., for Champlin Refining Co.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 213-219 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. J. Berry King and E. S. Ratliff, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., and W. P. Z. German of Tulsa, Okl., and John H. Miley, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for Corporation Commission and others.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 219-223 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Ciero Q. Murray, of Oklahoma City, Okl., Warwick M. Downing, of Denver, Colo., Kenner McConnell, of Columbus, Ohio, and Philip Kates, of Tulsa, Okl., amici curiae.

Mr. Justice BUTLER, delivered the opinion of the court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse