Jump to content

Colorimetry/Chapter 2

From Wikisource
4690968Colorimetry — Chapter 21968I. Nimeroff
2. The 1931 CIE Standard Colorimetric System and 1964 Supplement
2.1. General Principles
A chart showing various spectrographic values
Fig. 2.Spectral tristimulus values according to the 1931 CIE standard observer.


In 1931, the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE)[1] recommended that all subsequent color data be expressed in terms of the same tristimulus system so that the results would be immediately comparable. The standard observer and coordinate system recommended [49, 65, 135, 143] is defined by the tristimulus values of the spectrum colors given in table 1a and plotted in figure 2. The supplementary observer for large fields, adopted by the CIE in 1964 [59] is given in table 1b. It will be noted that the primaries chosen are such that none of these tristimulus values is less than zero. It is further true that the green primary chosen, whose amounts are designated by y, is such as to carry all of the luminosity, the other two primaries (red, blue) whose amounts are designated by and , respectively, being unassociated with luminosity. Therefore, the values of for the spectrum correspond to the standard luminosity function, and it is convenient and customary to express the value of a luminous area as its luminance (photometric brightness) in terms of some recognized unit (such as candles per square meter, milli-lambert, or foot-lambert). The value of an opaque specimen may be conveniently expressed as its luminous reflectance (ratio of reflected to incident luminous flux); and the value of a transmitting specimen is customarily put in terms of luminous transmittance (ratio of transmitted to incident luminous flux).

Table 1(a). The 1931 CIE standard observer (2°)
Wave­length,
nm
Spectral tristimulus values of equal-energy
380 0.0014 0.0000 0.0065
385 .0022 .0001 .0106
390 .0042 .0001 .0201
395 .0076 .0002 .0362
400 .0143 .0004 .0679
405 .0232 .0006 .1102
410 .0435 .0012 .2074
415 .0776 .0022 .3713
420 .1344 .0040 .6456
425 .2148 .0073 1.0391
430 .2839 .0116 1.3856
435 .8285 .0168 1.6230
440 .3483 .0230 1.7471
445 .3481 .0298 1.7826
450 .3362 .0380 .7721
455 .3187 .0480 1.7441
460 .2908 .0600 1.6692
465 .2511 .0739 1.5281
470 .1954 .0910 1.2876
475 .1421 .1126 1.0419
480 .0956 .1390 0.8130
485 .0580 .1693 .6162
490 .0320 .2080 .4652
495 .0147 .2586 .3533
500 .0049 .3230 .2720
505 .0024 .4073 .2123
510 .0093 .5030 .1582
515 .0291 .6082 .1117
520 .0633 .7100 .0782
525 .1096 .7932 .0573
530 .1655 .8620 .0422
535 .2257 .9149 .0298
540 .2904 .9540 .0203
545 .3597 .9803 .0134
550 .4334 .9950 .0087
555 .5121 1.0002 .0057
560 .5945 0.9950 .0039
565 .6784 .9786 .0027
570 .7621 .9520 .0021
575 .8425 .9154 .0018
580 .9163 .8700 .0017
585 .9786 .8163 .0014
590 1.0263 .7570 .0011
595 1.0567 .6949 .0010
600 1.0622 .6310 .0008
605 1.0456 .5668 .0006
610 1.0026 .5030 .0003
615 0.9384 .4412 .0002
620 .8544 .3810 .0002
625 .7514 .3210 .0001
630 .6424 .2650 .0000
635 .5419 .2170 .0000
640 .4479 .1750 .0000
645 .3608 .1382 .0000
650 .2835 .1070 .0000
655 .2187 .0816 .0000
660 .1649 .0610 .0000
665 .1212 .0446 .0000
670 .0874 .0320 .0000
675 .0636 .0232 .0000
680 .0468 .0170 .0000
685 .0329 .0119 .0000
690 .0227 .0082 .0000
695 .0158 .0057 .0000
700 .0114 .0041 .0000
705 .0081 .0029 .0000
710 .0058 .0021 .0000
715 .0041 .0015 .0000
720 .0029 .0010 .0000
725 .0020 .0007 .0000
730 .0014 .0005 .0000
735 .0010 .0004 .0000
740 .0007 .0003 .0000
745 .0005 .0002 .0000
750 .0003 .0001 .0000
755 .0002 .0001 .0000
760 .0002 .0001 .0000
765 .0001 .0000 .0000
770 .0001 .0000 .0000
775 .0000 .0000 .0000
780 .0000 .0000 .0000
Totals 21.3713 21.3714 21.3715
Table 1(b). The 1964 CIE supplementary observer (10°)
Wave­length,
nm
Spectral tristimulus values of equal-energy
380 0.0002 0.0000 0.0007
385 0.0007 0.0001 .0029
390 .0024 .0003 .0105
395 .0072 .0008 .0323
400 .0191 .0020 .0860
405 .0434 .1140 .1971
410 .0847 .0008 .0323
415 .1406 .0145 .6568
420 .0245 0.214 .9725
425 .2647 .0295 1.2825
430 .3147 .0387 1.5535
435 .3577 .0496 1.7985
440 .3837 .0621 1.9673
445 .3867 .0747 .20273
450 .3707 .0895 1.9948
455 .3430 .1063 1.9007
460 .3023 .1282 1.7454
465 .2541 .1528 1.5549
470 .1956 .1852 1.3176
475 .1323 .2199 1.0302
480 .0805 .2536 0.7721
485 .0411 .2977 .5701
490 .0162 .3391 .4153
495 .0051 .3954 .3024
500 .0038 .4608 .2185
505 .0154 .5314 .1592
510 .0375 .6067 .1120
515 .0714 .6857 .0822
520 .1177 .7618 .0607
525 .1730 .8233 .0431
530 .2365 .8752 .0305
535 .3042 .9238 .0206
540 .3768 .9620 .0137
545 .4516 .9822 .0079
550 .5298 .9918 .0040
555 .6161 .9991 .0011
560 .7052 .9973 .0000
565 .7938 .9824 .0000
570 .8787 .9555 .0000
575 .9512 .9152 .0000
580 1.0142 .8689 .0000
585 1.0743 .8256 .0000
590 1.1185 .7774 .0000
595 1.1343 .7204 .0000
600 1.1240 .6583 .0000
605 1.0891 .5939 .0000
610 1.0305 .5280 .0000
615 0.9507 .4618 .0000
620 .8563 .3981 .0000
625 .7549 .3396 .0000
630 .6475 .2835 .0000
635 .5351 .2283 .0000
640 .4316 .1798 .0000
645 .3437 .1402 .0000
650 .2683 .1076 .0000
655 .2043 .0812 .0000
660 .1526 .0603 .0000
665 .1122 .0441 .0000
670 .0813 .0318 .0000
675 .0579 .0226 .0000
680 .0409 .0159 .0000
685 .0286 .0111 .0000
690 .0199 .0077 .0000
695 .0138 .0054 .0000
700 .0096 .0037 .0000
705 .0066 .0026 .0000
710 .0046 .0018 .0000
715 .0031 .0012 .0000
720 .0022 .0008 .0000
725 .0015 .0006 .0000
730 .0010 .0004 .0000
735 .0007 .0003 .0000
740 .0005 .0002 .0000
745 .0004 .0001 .0000
750 .0003 .0001 .0000
755 .0002 .0001 .0000
760 .0001 .0000 .0000
765 .0001 .0000 .0000
770 .0001 .0000 .0000
775 .0000 .0000 .0000
780 .0000 .0000 .0000
Totals 23.3294 23.3323 23.3343
Table 2(a). Chromaticity coordinates of the spectrum colors (2°)
Wave­length,
nm
Chromaticity coordinates
380 0.1741 0.0050 0.8209
385 .1740 .0050 .8210
390 .1738 .0049 .8213
395 .1736 .0049 .8215
400 .1733 .0048 .8219
405 .1730 .0048 .8222
410 .1726 .0048 .8226
415 .1721 .0048 .8231
420 .1714 .0051 .8235
425 .1703 .0058 .8239
430 .1689 .0069 .8242
435 .1669 .0086 .8245
440 .1644 .0109 .8247
445 .1611 .0138 .8251
450 .1566 .0177 .8257
455 .1510 .0227 .8263
460 .1440 .0297 .8263
465 .1355 .0399 .8246
470 .1241 .0578 .8181
475 .1096 .0868 .8036
480 .0913 .1327 .7760
485 .0687 .2007 .7306
490 .0454 .2950 .6596
495 .0235 .4127 .5638
500 .0082 .5384 .4534
505 .0039 .6548 .3413
510 .0139 .7502 .2359
515 .0389 .8120 .1491
520 .0743 .8338 .0919
525 .1142 .8262 .0596
530 .1547 .8059 .0394
535 .1929 .7816 .0255
540 .2296 .7543 .0161
545 .2658 .7243 0099
550 .3016 .6923 .0061
555 .3373 .6589 .0038
560 .3731 .6245 .0024
565 .4087 .5896 .0017
570 .4441 .5547 .0012
575 .4788 .5202 .0010
580 .5125 .4866 .0009
585 .5448 .4544 .0008
590 .5752 .4242 .0006
595 .6029 .3965 .0006
600 .6270 .3725 .0005
605 .6482 .3514 .0004
610 .6658 .3340 .0002
615 .6801 .3197 .0002
620 .6915 .3083 .0002
625 .7006 .2993 .0001
630 .7079 .2920 .0001
635 .7140 .2859 .0001
640 .7190 .2809 .0001
645 .7230 .2770 .0000
650 .7260 .2740 .0000
655 .7283 .2717 .0000
660 .7300 .2700 .0000
665 .7311 .2689 .0000
670 .7320 .2680 .0000
675 .7327 .2673 .0000
680 .7334 .2666 .0000
685 .7340 .2660 .0000
690 .7344 .2656 .0000
695 .7346 .2654 .0000
700 .7347 .2653 .0000
705 .7347 .2653 .0000
710 .7347 .2653 .0000
715 .7347 .2653 .0000
720 .7347 .2653 .0000
725 .7347 .2653 .0000
730 .7347 .2653 .0000
735 .7347 .2653 .0000
740 .7347 .2653 .0000
745 .7347 .2653 .0000
750 .7347 .2653 .0000
755 .7347 .2653 .0000
760 .7347 .2653 .0000
765 .7347 .2653 .0000
770 .7347 .2653 .0000
775 .7347 .2653 .0000
780 .7347 .2653 .0000
Table 2(b). Chromaticity coordinates of the spectrum colors (10°)
Wave­length,
nm
Chromaticity coordinates
0.380 0.1813 0.0197 0.7990
.385 .1809 .0195 .7996
.390 .1803 .0194 .8003
.395 .1795 .0190 .8015
.400 1784 0187 .8029
.405 .1771 .0184 .8045
.410 .1755 .0181 .8064
.415 .1732 .0178 .8090
.420 .1706 .0179 .8115
.425 .1679 .0187 .8134
.430 .1650 .0203 .8147
.435 .1622 .0225 .8153
.440 .1590 .0257 .8153
.445 .1554 .0300 .8146
.450 .1510 .0364 .8126
.455 .1459 .0452 .8088
.460 .1389 .0589 .8022
.465 .1295 .0779 .7926
.470 .1152 .1090 .7758
.475 .0957 .1591 .7452
.480 .0728 .2292 .6980
.485 .0452 .3275 .6273
.490 .0210 .4401 .5389
.495 .0073 .5625 .4302
.500 .0056 .6745 .3199
.505 .0219 .7526 .2256
.510 .0495 .8023 .1482
.515 .0850 .8170 .0980
.520 .1252 .8102 .0646
.525 .1664 .7922 .0414
.530 .2071 .7663 .0267
.535 .2436 .7399 .0165
.540 .2786 .7113 .0101
.545 .3132 .6813 .0055
.550 .3473 .6501 .0026
.555 .3812 .6182 .0007
.560 .4142 .5858 .0000
.565 .4469 .5531 .0000
.570 .4790 .5210 .0000
.575 .5096 .4904 .0000
.580 .5386 .4614 .0000
.585 .5654 .4346 .0000
.590 .5900 .4100 .0000
.595 .6116 .3884 .0000
.600 .6306 .3694 .0000
.605 .6471 .3529 .0000
.610 .6612 .3388 .0000
.615 .6731 .3269 .0000
.620 .6827 .3173 .0000
.625 .6898 .3102 .0000
.630 .6955 .3045 .0000
.635 .7010 .2990 .0000
.640 .7059 .2941 .0000
.645 .7103 .2898 .0000
.650 .7137 .2863 .0000
.655 .7156 .2844 .0000
.660 .7168 .2832 .0000
.665 .7179 .2821 .0000
.670 .7187 .2813 .0000
.675 .7193 .2807 .0000
.680 .7198 .2802 .0000
.685 .7200 .2800 .0000
.690 .7202 .2798 .0000
.695 .7203 .2797 .0000
.700 .7204 .2796 .0000
.705 .7203 .2797 .0000
.710 .7202 .2798 .0000
.715 .7201 .2799 .0000
.720 .7199 .2801 .0000
.725 .7197 .2803 .0000
.730 .7195 .2806 .0000
.735 .7192 .2808 .0000
.740 .7189 .2811 .0000
.745 .7186 .2814 .0000
.750 .7183 .2817 .0000
.755 .7180 .2820 .0000
.760 .7176 .2824 .0000
.765 .7172 .2828 .0000
.770 .7169 .2831 .0000
.775 .7165 .2835 .0000
.780 .7161 .2839 .0000

If, as is usual, light combinations are not the chief interest, it is convenient to substitute for the tristimulus values, the two ratios, and , combined with the luminous value, . The two ratios are known as chromaticity coordinates, , because they serve to A chart showing boundaries of visible lightFig. 3.The (x,y) chromaticitiy diagram, showing the spectrum locus and the purple boundary.Wavelength is indicated in millimicrons. The hue names are those proposed by Kelly (77). specify the chromatic aspect of the light. The analogous ratio, , is also known as a chromaticity coordinate, , but only two of the three coordinates, , give independent information since by definition the sum of all three is unity. Table 2a gives the chromaticity coordinates, of the spectrum colors for 2° and table 2b for 10° fields [59]. Figure 3 shows the points representing the spectrum colors in the ()-chromaticity diagram. This diagram is also known as a Maxwell triangle because of Maxwell's first use of such a diagram [98]. Furthermore, it has aptly been called a mixture diagram because it indicates in a very simple way the chromaticity of the color resulting from the additive combination of any two lights. The point representing this chromaticity is found on the straight line connecting the points representing two lights. The primary lights are represented by points at the corners of a triangle, and every point within the triangle represents the chromaticity of a mixture of the primary lights whose proportions are indicated by the chromaticity coordinates, . The spectrum colors are shown by a smooth curve known as the spectrum locus. A few points on this locus are identified by wavelength in nanometers. It will be noted from figure 3 that the spectrum locus is substantially straight from 540 nm to the long-wave extreme. This means that the standard observer would find binary mixtures of, say, 540 nm with 640 nm, closely equivalent to some intermediate portion of the spectrum. But the spectrum locus from 540 nm to the short-wave extreme is curved outward. This means that for the standard observer a binary mixture of 540 nm with, say, 440 nm would differ importantly in chromaticity from the intermediate parts of the spectrum. By drawing straight lines through any central point (such as x = y = ⅓, representing the so-called equal-energy stimulus) and extending them until they cut the spectrum locus, we may find the spectral complementaries relative to a stimulus represented by that point; that is, we may find the two parts of the spectrum that, when combined in proper proportions, will for the standard observer be equivalent to the central stimulus.

The straight line in figure 3 joining the extremes of the spectrum locus represents the chromaticities of the mixtures of the two extremes of the visible spectrum. The area bounded by the closed curve made up of the spectrum locus and this straight line is the locus of all physically realizable chromaticities. Note that the points representing the primaries of the CIE coordinate system, the apices of the triangle (; ; ), all fall outside this area; that is, the primaries are imaginary. Note also that both the and primaries fall on the line , which is unassociated with luminosity and is known as the alychne or lightless line. The short-wave extreme of the spectrum locus comes close to this line; this means that, although it has the power to elicit in the standard observer a considerable and response, resulting in a vivid bluish purple color, radiant flux of wavelength 380 to 420 nm is almost unassociated with luminosity. The areas in figure 3 corresponding to common color designations for lights are those proposed by Kelly [77] and will be discussed later.

2.2. Standard Sources

At the time of setting up the standard observer and coordinate system, the International Commission on Illumination [135], Commission International de I'Eclairage (CIE), recommended use of three standard sovirces for colorimetry; source A, representative of gas-filled incandescent lamps; source B, representative of noon sunlight; and source C, representative of average daylight such as that from a completely overcast sky. Source A is an incandescent lamp operated at a color temperature of 2854 °K, on the international temperature scale ( = 14,380). Source B is obtained by using this same lamp in combination with a two-cell Davis-Gibson liquid filter designed to give a color temperature of about 5000 °K. Source C is obtained similarly and results in a source of correlated color temperature about 6800 °K. These sources are recommended for general use, or whenever there is no special reason for using some other source. Table 3 gives the relative spectral irradiance of Sources A, B, C, D5500, D6500, and D7500. Sources D5500, D6500, D7500 represent several phases of daylight, closely represented by the subscripted correlated color temperatures. Tables 4a and 4b give computation forms for evaluation of the colors of non-self-luminous specimens that transmit, scatter, or reflect incident light for the 2° standard observer. Table 4a refers to Source A; table 4b, to Source C. Source B is relatively little used except in Great Britain. Table 4c gives corresponding values for the 10° observer.

Table 3. Relative spectral irradiance E of the six standard sources, A, B, C, D5500,D6500 and D7500
Wave­length
nm
EA EB EC E5500 E6500 E7500
380 9.79 22.40 33.00 32.60 50.00 66.70
385 10.90 26.85 39.92 33.35 52.30 68.35
390 12.09 31.30 47.40 38.10 54.60 70.00
395 13.36 36.18 55.17 49.50 68.70 85.95
400 14.71 41.30 63.30 60.90 82.80 101.90
405 16.15 46.62 71.81 64.75 87.15 106.90
410 17.68 52.10 80.60 68.60 91.50 111.90
415 19.29 57.70 89.53 70.10 92.45 112.35
420 21.00 63.20 98.10 71.60 93.40 112.80
425 22.79 68.37 105.80 69.75 90.05 107.95
430 24.67 73.10 112.40 (illegible text) 86.70 (illegible text)
435 26.64 77.31 117.75 76.75 95.80 112.15
440 28.70 80.80 121.50 85.60 104.90 (illegible text)
445 30.85 83.44 123.45 91.80 110.95 127.25
450 33.09 85.40 124.00 98.00 117.00 133.30
455 35.41 86.88 123.60 99.25 114.40 132.85
460 37.82 88.30 123.10 100.50 117.80 132.40
465 40.30 90.08 123.30 100.20 116.35 129.85
470 42.87 92.00 123.80 99.90 114.90 127.30
475 45.52 93.75 124.09 101.30 115.40 127.05
480 48.25 95.20 123.90 102.70 115.90 126.80
485 51.04 96.23 122.92 100.40 112.35 122.30
490 53.91 96.50 120.70 98.10 108.80 117.80
495 56.85 95.71 116.90 99.40 109.10 117.20
500 59.86 94.20 112.10 100.70 109.40 116.60
505 62.93 92.37 106.98 100.70 108.60 115.15
510 66.06 90.70 102.30 100.70 107.80 113.70
515 69.25 89.65 98.81 100.35 106.30 111.20
520 72.50 89.50 96.90 100.00 104.80 108.70
525 75.79 90.43 96.78 102.10 106.25 109.55
530 79.13 92.20 98.00 104.20 107.70 110.40
535 82.52 94.46 99.94 103.15 106.05 108.35
540 85.95 96.90 102.10 102.10 104.40 106.30
545 89.41 99.16 103.95 102.55 104.20 105.60
550 92.91 101.00 105.20 103.00 104.00 104.90
555 96.44 102.20 105.67 101.50 102.00 102.45
560 100.00 102.80 105.30 100.00 100.00 100.00
565 103.58 102.92 104.11 98.60 98.15 97.80
570 107.18 102.60 102.30 97.20 96.30 95.60
575 110.80 101.90 100.15 97.45 96.05 94.90
580 114.44 101.00 97.80 97.70 95.80 94.20
585 118.08 100.07 95.43 94.55 92.25 90.60
590 121.73 99.20 93.20 91.40 88.70 87.00
595 125.39 98.44 91.22 92.90 89.35 87.10
600 129.04 98.00 89.70 94.40 90.00 87.20
605 132.70 98.08 88.83 94.75 89.80 86.65
610 136.34 98.50 88.40 95.10 89.60 86.10
615 139.99 99.06 88.19 94.65 88.65 64.85
620 143.62 99.70 88.10 94.20 87.70 83.60
625 147.23 100.36 88.06 92.30 85.50 81.15
630 150.83 100.00 88.00 90.40 83.30 78.70
635 154.42 101.56 87.86 91.35 83.50 78.55
640 157.98 102.20 87.80 91.30 83.70 78.40
645 161.51 103.05 87.99 90.60 81.85 76.60
650 165.03 103.90 88.30 88.90 80.00 74.80
655 168.51 104.59 88.20 89.60 80.10 74.55
660 171.96 105.00 87.90 90.30 80.20 74.30
665 175.38 105.08 87.22 92.10 81.25 74.85
670 178.77 104.90 86.30 93.90 82.80 75.40
675 182.12 104.55 85.30 91.95 80.30 73.50
680 184.43 103.90 84.00 90.00 78.30 71.60
685 188.70 102.84 82.21 84.85 74.00 69.75
690 191.93 101.60 80.20 79.70 69.70 63.00
695 195.12 100.38 78.24 81.25 70.65 64.50
700 198.26 99.10 76.30 82.80 71.60 65.10
705 201.36 97.70 74.36 83.80 72.95 66.60
710 204.41 96.20 72.40 84.80 74.30 68.10
715 207.41 94.60 70.40 77.50 67.95 62.25
720 210.36 92.90 68.30 70.20 61.60 56.40
725 213.26 91.10 66.30 74.75 65.75 60.30
730 216.12 89.40 64.40 79.30 69.90 64.20
735 218.92 88.00 62.80 82.15 72.50 66.70
740 221.66 86.90 61.50 85.00 75.10 69.20
745 224.36 85.90 60.20 78.45 69.35 63.90
750 227.00 85.20 59.20 71.90 63.60 58.60
755 229.58 84.80 58.50 62.35 55.00 50.60
760 232.11 84.70 58.10 52.80 46.40 42.60
765 234.59 84.90 58.00 64.35 56.60 52.00
770 237.01 85.40 58.20 75.90 66.80 61.40
775 239.37 86.10 58.50 73.85 65.10 59.85
780 241.67 87.00 59.10 71.80 63.40 58.30

Table 4a. Computation form

CIE coordinates (2°) Source A (2854 "K.)

Sample   Source of Trans. Data  
Submitted by     
λ
(nm)
380 1 6 0.
90 5 23 .
400 19 1 93 .
10 71 2 340 .
20 262 8 1256 .
30 649 27 3167 .
40 926 61 4647 .
450 1031 117 5435 .
60 1019 210 5851 .
70 776 362 5116 .
80 428 622 3636 .
90 160 1039 2324 .
500 27 1792 1509 .
10 57 3080 969 .
20 425 4771 525 .
30 1214 6322 309 .
40 2313 7600 162 .
550 3732 8568 75 .
60 5510 9222 36 .
70 7571 9457 21 .
80 9719 9228 18 .
90 11579 8540 12 .
600 12704 7547 10 .
10 12669 6356 4 .
20 11373 5071 8 .
30 8980 3704 .
40 6558 2562 .
650 4336 1637 .
60 2628 972 .
70 1448 530 .
80 804 292 .
90 404 146 .
700 209 75 .
10 110 40 .
20 57 19 .
30 28 10 .
40 14 6 .
750 6 2 .
60 4 2 .
70 2 .
Sums 109828 100000 35547 Sums
0.4476 0.4075 0.1449
, , and

Computed by   Checked by  

Planck 2854 °K., C2 = 14,380
Planck 2848 °K., C2 = 14,350

Table 4b. Computation form

CIE Coordinates Source C (Davis Gibson, 2854 °K. to 6800°K)

Sample   Source of Trans. Data  
Submitted by     
λ
(nm)
380 4 20 0. 
90 19 89 .
400 85 2 404 .
10 329 9 1570 .
20 1238 37 5949 .
30 2997 122 14628 .
40 3975 262 19938 .
450 3915 443 20638 .
60 3362 694 19299 .
70 2272 1058 14972 .
80 1112 1618 9461 .
90 363 2358 5274 .
500 52 3401 2864 .
10 89 4833 1520 .
20 876 6462 712 .
30 1523 7934 388 .
40 2785 9149 195 .
560 4282 9832 86 .
60 5880 9841 89 .
70 7322 9147 20 .
80 8417 7992 16 .
90 8984 6627 10 .
600 8949 5316 7 .
10 8325 4176 2 .
20 7070 3153 2 .
30 5309 2190 .
40 3693 1443 .
650 2349 886 .
60 1361 504 .
7O 708 259 .
80 369 134 .
90 171 62 .
700 82 29 .
10 39 14 .
20 19 6 .
30 8 3 .
40 4 2 .
750 2 1 .
60 1 1 .
70 1 .
Sums 98041 100000 118103 Sums
0.3101 0.3163 0.3736
, , and

Planck 2854 "K., = 14,380
Planck 2848 °K., = 14.350

Computed by   Checked by  

Table 4c. 10° Distribution coefficients for sources SA and SC
For SA For SC
λ
(nm)
380 1 1 2
90 3 11 9 1 43
400 25 3 111 103 11 463
10 132 14 605 581 60 2672
20 377 40 1795 1708 179 8122
30 682 83 3368 3011 370 14865
40 968 156 4962 3969 343 20349
450 1078 260 5802 3914 945 21058
60 1005 426 5802 3168 1343 18292
70 737 698 4965 2062 1952 13887
80 341 1076 3274 840 2675 8144
90 76 1607 1968 167 3484 4268
500 20 2424 1150 37 4398 2085
10 218 3523 650 327 5284 976
20 750 4854 387 971 6285 501
30 1644 6086 212 1973 7302 255
40 2847 7267 104 3275 8362 119
550 4326 8099 33 4744 8882 36
60 8198 8766 6322 8941
70 8277 9002 7653 9322
80 10201 8740 8444 7235
90 11967 8317 8874 6168
600 12748 7466 8583 5027
10 12349 6327 7756 3974
20 10809 5026 6422 2986
30 8583 3758 4851 2124
40 5992 2496 3226 1344
650 3892 1561 2014 808
60 2306 911 1142 451
70 1277 499 598 233
80 666 259 293 114
90 336 130 136 53
700 167 64 62 24
10 83 33 28 11
20 40 15 13 4
30 19 8 5 3
40 10 4 3 1
750 6 2 2 1
60 2 1
70 2 1
111,159 100,000 32,200 97,298 100,000 116,137

2.3. Spectrophotometric Colorimetry

The fundamental nature of the tristimulus specification of color permits it to be used as a common denominator by means of which colorimeters involving color standards of glass, plastic, or solutions, or systems of material color standards, transparent and opaque, may be inter-compared. In order to demonstrate how the CIE standard observer and coordinate system may be used for this purpose, four printing inks, red purple, greenish yellow, greenish blue, and blue, have been evaluated, and the steps are reproduced here in detail. Figure 4 shows spectral reflectances of these four printing inks obtained on a recording spectrophotometer. Table 5a gives the spectral reflectances read from the originals of the curves of figure 4. These reflectances apply to the specimens measured except for small wave-length-scale and photometric-scale corrections which have not been applied. Table 5b gives for the greenish yellow specimen the products indicated on the form for computation of luminous reflectance, , and chromaticity coordinates, ,,, under standard source C; see table 4b. The sums of these products are the tristimulus values, ,,. The luminous reflectance is found as ; and the chromaticity coordinates, ,,, are found by dividing ,, and , respectively, by the corresponding sum, . Table 5c lists these results for all four printing-ink specimens. Figure 5 is the (,)-chromaticity diagram on which have been plotted large dots to represent these chromaticity coordinates, ,.

Comparison of figure 5 with figure 3 shows that the chromaticity points of the four printing-ink specimens correspond to the hue designations red purple, greenish yellow, and blue. This accords well with the color designations found by visual inspection of the specimens. Furthermore, it will be noted that one of the blues is greener than the other. The position of the chromaticity point for the greener-ink color is in accord with the greener hue of this ink. Note also that the greenish yellow is much lighter than the red purple or either of the blues; this accords with the luminous reflectance determinations (compare 0.74 with 0.221, 0.242, and 0.246 in table 5c).

2.4. Short-Cuts and Automatic Computation

The labor of computing ,,, or ,,, corresponding to pairs of spectrophotometric curves to see how the colors of the corresponding specimens compare is considerably great. Often the degree of metamerism exhibited by the pair is sufficiently small that the comparison can be made directly from the curves themselves, and much product-control work can be handled in this way. There is still frequent need, in the establishment of color standards and tests for conformity to those standards, to compute the tristimulus values, ,,, by a short-cut method, the selected ordinate method, to reduce spectrophotometric data.

In this method the ordinates of the spectrophotometric curve are read at a series of selected wavelengths different for each source. Instead of multiplying by the tristimulus values of the spectrum of the source, , , , the selected ordinates are spaced proportionately closer in the wavelength regions where the tristimulus values are higher, and the corresponding readings of spectral reflectance are simply added. Tables 6 gives [21, 49] selected ordinates for source A (incandescent lamp light) and source C (average daylight). Table 7 gives the spectral reflectances of the greenish yellow printing-ink specimen read from figure 4b for the selected ordinates for source C together with the sums of these spectral reflectances, both for ten ordinates and for thirty. It will be noted that, after applying the multiplying factors listed in table 6, the tristimulus values, for the greenish yellow printing-ink specimen are found again to a close approximation (compare 0.630, 0.704, and 0.145 from table 7 with 0.631, 0.704, and 0.145, respectively, from table 5c.

A group of four charts showing wavelength values
Fig. 4.Spectral reflectance of printing-ink specimens: (a) red-purple; (h) greenish yellow; (c) greenish blue; (d) blue.

Ten selected ordinates sometimes give significant information (see table 7); thirty selected ordinates are often sufficient (as above); and one hundred selected ordinates are sufficient for all but a few very irregular spectral distributions (such as produced by gaseous discharge tubes). These wavelengths are available for many sources in other publications [13, 21, 49]. Nickerson [114] and De Kerf [27] have published studies of the reliability of the selected-ordinate method of computation.

Analog and digital techniques have been developed for use with automatic computing devices to abbreviate the labor of computation required by spectrophotometric colorimetry. In the application of the analog technique [25] data are sent directly from the spectrophotometer to the computer without wavelength-scale and photometric-scale corrections. In one application of the digital technique [12, 95] spectral data are punched directly on cards and fed into the computer, while in another [75] the spectral data are corrected and then punched on cards and fed into the computer.

2.5. Visual Tristimulus Colorimeters

Tristimulus values, may be obtained by direct comparison of the unknown light with an optical mixture of three primary lights in a divided photometric field. Since the primaries of the CIE standard colorimetric coordinate system are imaginery, such a tristimulus colorimeter cannot be made to read directly. It must be calibrated by measurements of four known stimuli, and then may yield tristimulus values, ,,, by a transformation the reverse of that indicated in eq. (3). Since the color matches set up in a tristimulus colorimeter designed to cover any substantial part of all possible colors with a single set of primaries exhibit serious metamerism, the field has to be relatively small, subtrending about 2 deg at the observer's eye. This restriction to a small angular size of field severely limits the precision of setting compared to what is possible by direct comparison of large specimens in daylight. Furthermore, the metamerism also prevents one normal observer from getting the same reading as another except by accident. If a reasonable approximation to the standard values of and is to be assured, either the readings of a group of five or ten observers must be averaged, or a color standard yielding a spectral composition similar to that of the unknown specimen must be used. Because of industrial interest in large-field color matching Stiles and Burch [146] and Speranskaya [144] determined the color-matching functions for 10°-field viewing. In this determination either the observers were instructed to ignore the Maxwell spot [73, 98, 103, 104, 156] or it was masked. The color-matching functions thus found are significantly different from the 2°-field functions of the 1931 CIE Standard Observer. The difference is chiefly that expected from the removal of an intervening yellow filter, the macular pigment, from the field of view.

Table 5a. Spectral reflectances of four printing-ink specimens
Wave­length,
nm
Spectral reflectance relative to magnesium oxide
Red
purple
Greenish
yellow
Greenish
blue
Blue
380 0.375[2] 0.091 0.150 0.230[2]
390  .375[2]  .089[2]  .187  .293[2]
400  .376  .085  .228  .354
410  .379  .079  .269  .415
420  .381  .077  .306  .458
430  .373  .076  .353  .505
440  .345  .077  .407  .563
450  .295  .086  .467  .616
460  .235  .095  .520  .639
470  .174  .108  .552  .645
480  .120  .145  .560  .635
490  .083  .250  .548  .608
500  .066  .445  .523  .568
510  .061  .635  .483  .508
520  .057  .708  .432  .438
530  .054  .725  .363  .353
540  .055  .733  .292  .272
550  .062  .743  .220  .198
560  .071  .752  .162  .145
570  .095  .768  .128  .117
580  .220  .782  .113  .106
590  .440  .787  .102  .102
600  .597  .790  .093  .098
610  .676  .793  .088  .097
620  .715  .798  .088  .103
630  .739  .803  .098  .122
640  .756  .809  .110  .147
650  .768  .814  .124  .172
660  .776  .818  .136  .187
670  .780  .822  .145  .186
680  .782  .824  .147  .172
690  .783  .827  .149  .162
700  .788  .829  .160  .169
710  .794  .832  .177  .192
720  .799  .883  .196  .221
730  .805  .885  .218  .256
740  .809  .836  .258  .304
750  .812  .837  .298  .362
760  .815[2]  .838[2]  .338[2]  .422[2]
770  .817[2]  .839[2]  .375[2]  .484[2]
Table 5b. Computation of tristimulus values, X, Y, Z, and chroniaticity coordinates, x, y, for the greenish-yellow printing-ink specimen under source C

(The computation form given as table 4b has been used.)

Wave­length,
nm
Reflect­ance
()
380 0.091 0 2
390 .089 2 8
400 .085 7 0 34
410 .079 26 1 124
420 .077 95 3 458
430 .076 228 9 1112
440 .077 306 20 1535
450 .086 337 38 1775
460 .095 319 66 1833
470 .108 245 114 1617
480 .145 161 235 1372
490 .250 91 590 1319
500 .445 23 1513 1274
510 .635 57 3069 965
520 .708 408 4575 504
530 .725 1104 5752 281
540 .733 2041 6706 143
550 .743 3182 7305 64
560 .752 4422 7400 29
570 .768 5623 7025 15
580 .782 6582 6250 13
590 .787 7070 5215 8
600 .790 7070 4200 6
610 .793 6602 3312 2
620 .798 5642 2516 2
630 .803 4263 1759 0
640 .809 2988 1167
650 .814 1912 721
660 .818 1113 412
670 .822 582 213
680 .824 304 110
690 .827 141 51
700 .829 639
710 .832 68
720 .833 32
730 .835 16
740 .836
750 .837
760 .838
770 .839
Tristimulus values 63,076 70,395 14,495
Chromaticity coordinates 0.4263 0.4758 0.0980
Table 5c. Tristimulus values, , , , under source C, luminous reflectance relative to magnesium oxide, , and chromaticity coordinates, x, y, computed from the spectral reflectance of four printing-ink specimens as in table 5b
Hue
designa­tion of
specimen
Tristimulus values, arbitrary units Lumi­nous
reflect­ance,
Chromaticity
coordinates
Red purple 39788 22124 30570 0.221 0.430 0.239
Greenish yellow 63076 70395 14495 .704 .426 .476
Greenish blue 19003 24245 54529 .242 .194 .248
Blue 21948 24633 69010 .246 .190 .213

It will be seen that tristimulus colorimeters give only poor information regarding the unknown specimen. Their application to product-control problems is negligible, but because of the ease of calibration and simplicity of the theory they are very useful research tools. Tristimulus colorimeters A chart showing visible light valuesFig. 5.Points representing the colors of four printing ink specimens whose spectral reflectances are shown in figure 9.4.The colors of the ideal closed-cavity radiator are also shown, the temperatures of the radiators being indicated in degrees Kelvin. The smooth curve connecting these points is often called the Planckian locus. have been built and described by Allen [3], Donaldson [28], Guild [43], McAdam [96], Newhall [110], Stiles [145], Verbeek [154], and Wright [157]. The Wright instrument has spectrum primaries; the other four have primaries formed by combining a light source with glass filters. To the Guild and Wright instruments we owe our accurate information regarding the properties of the normal visual system which have been expressed in terms of the standard observer.

The foregoing instruments make up the comparison-field mixture by optical combination of light beams from different sources so that a sum of the separate effects is obtained. A similar optical effect is obtained if the beams are caused to fall upon the same portion of the retina in such rapid succession that a nonflickering spot of color is seen. The effect is that of a time-weighted average of the separate beams. A very simple and widely used tristimulus colorimeter is obtained by taking four disks that have been cut along a radius, interlocking them so as to expose a sector of each, and causing them to rotate on the spindle of a motor so rapidly that neither the separate sectors nor even flicker is perceived. Such an arrangement for combining colors by rotary mixture is called a Maxwell disk. The four disks provide the necessary three degrees of freedom in the adjustment for a match, and if the tristimulus values of the component disks be known (, the tristimulus values of the mixture can be computed from the fractions of the total area occupied by the respective sectors, :

(4)

If the disks are chosen anew for each kind of unknown color to be measured so as to be all fairly similar in color to the unknown, the spectral composition of the mixture color is usually sufficiently nonmetameric that no restriction to the central 2 deg of the retina is required. Furthermore any two normal observers with some experience at making the adjustment can check each other closely. The chief drawback of this simple arrangement for product-control work in color is the time lost in adjustment of the sector disk areas. The motor must be turned off, brought to a stop, the disks loosened and readjusted, the motor turned on and allowed to resume speed several times to obtain a final setting of reasonably good, precision.

Nickerson has described a disk colorimeter [105] that avoids the difficulties of the elementary Maxwell disk. Light reflected from the unknown specimen fills one-half of a photometric field, and that from a stationary sector disk fills the other. By having the observer look at the sector disk through a rapidly rotating glass wedge, each sector is presented to view in sufficiently quick succession that no flicker is produced; and at the same time the sectors, since they are stationary, may be continuously adjusted until a color match is obtained. A further advantage is obtained by extending the rotary scanning to the unknown specimen. In this way the average color of a notably nonuniform specimen such as that made up of coarse salt crystals may be obtained. The disk, colorimeter has been extensively used by the United States Department of Agriculture for the color-grading of food products and is well adapted to product-control colorimetry of many kinds.

2.6. Dominant Wavelength and Purity

Another way to identify a combination of lights to specify a color, alternate to the tristimulus method, is to determine the luminance (photometric brightness) of one spot of light of fixed spectral composition (such as average daylight) and the luminance of a spot of light of continuously variable spectral composition separately identified (as by wavelength in the spectrum). In this way the requisite three degrees of freedom in adjustment to a color match are supplied. This form of identification leads naturally into a specification in which the luminance [20] of the unknown is given and the chromaticity is specified by two variables in polar coordinates. One of these variables is an angle, the other a radius, and both can be computed from the chromaticity coordinates of the fixed spot of light, the variable spot of light, and the unknown, these coordinates serving to locate the respective positions in a chromaticity diagram. If the fixed light is nearly achromatic, the angle often correlates well with the hue of the color perception, and the radius fairly well with its saturation. The most fundamental way to specify the direction on a chromaticity diagram from the point representing the fixed light to the point representing the unknown light is by wavelength of the part of the spectrum required to make the match. If the unknown color can be matched by adding some part of the spectrum to the fixed light, it is said to have a spectral color, and the required wavelength is called dominant wavelength. But if a color match is produced for the fixed light by adding some part of the spectrum to the unknown color, the unknown is said to be nonspectral, and the required wavelength is called the complementary wavelength. Either dominant wavelength or complementary wavelength may be obtained for the standard observer by drawing on a chromaticity diagram a straight line through the point representing the fixed light and that representing the unknown color, and then by reading the wavelength corresponding to the point at which this line extended intersects the locus of spectrum colors. If the unknown color is plotted between the fixed light and the spectrum, the intersection gives the dominant wavelength; but if the fixed light is represented by a point intermediate to the unknown and the intersection of the straight line with the spectrum locus, the intersection indicates the complementary wave-length.

Table 6. Selected Ordinates (In Nanometers) for Computing Tristimuliis Values, X, Y, Z, for Specimens Under Standard Sources A and C [20]
Number Source A Source C
X Y Z X Y Z
 1 444.0 487.8 416.4 424.4 465.9 414.1
 2[3] 516.9[3] 507.7[3] 424.9[3] 435.5[3] 489.4[3] 422.2[3]
 3 544.0 517.3 429.4 443.9 500.4 426.3
 4 554.2 524.1 432.9 452.1 508.7 429.4
 5[3] 561.4[3] 529.8[3] 436.0[3] 461.2[3] 515.1[3] 432.0[3]
 6 567.1 534.8 438.7 474.0 520.6 434.3
 7 572.0 539.4 441.3 531.2 525.4 436.5
 8[3] 576.3[3] 543.7[3] 443.7[3] 544.3[3] 529.8[3] 438.6[3]
 9 580.2 547.8 446.0 552.4 533.9 440.6
10 583.9 551.7 448.3 558.7 537.7 442.5
11[3] 587.2[3] 555.4[3] 450.5[3] 564.1[3] 541.4[3] 444.4[3]
12 590.5 559.1 452.6 568.9 544.9 446.3
13 593.5 562.7 454.7 573.2 548.4 448.2
14[3] 596.5[3] 566.3[3] 456.8[3] 577.3[3] 551.8[3] 450.1[3]
15 599.4 569.8 458.8 581.3 555.1 452.1
16 602.3 573.3 460.8 585.0 558.5 454.0
17[3] 605.2[3] 576.9[3] 462.9[3] 588.7[3] 561.9[3] 455.9[3]
18 608.0 580.5 464.9 592.4 565.3 457.9
19 610.9 584.1 467.0 596.0 568.9 459.9
20[3] 613 8[3] 587.9[3] 469.2[3] 599.6[3] 572.5[3] 462.0[3]
21 616.9 591.8 471.6 603.3 576.4 464.1
22 620.0 595.9 474.1 607.0 580.5 466.3
23[3] 623.3[3] 600.1[3] 476.8[3] 610.9[3] 584.8[3] 468.7[3]
24 626.9 604.7 479.9 615.0 589.6 471.4
25 630.8 609.7 483.4 619.4 594.8 474.3
26[3] 635.3[3] 615.2[3] 487.5[3] 624.2[3] 600.8[3] 477.7[3]
27 640.5 621.5 492.7 629.8 607.7 481.8
28 646.9 629.2 499.3 636.6 616.1 487.2
29[3] 655.9[3] 639.7[3] 508.4[3] 645.9[3] 627.3[3] 495.2[3]
30 673.5 659.0 526.7 663.0 647.4 511.2
Multiplying factors
30 ordinates 0.03661 0.03333 0.01185 0.03268 0.03333 0.03938
10 ordinates  .10984  .10000  .03555  .09804  .10000  .11812

The degree of approach of the unknown color to the spectrum color is commonly indicated by the ratio of the amount of the spectrum color to the total amount of the two-part combination; this ratio is called purity, and if the amounts are specified in luminance units, the ratio is called luminance (formerly colorimetric) purity. By far the most common convention, however, is to express the amounts in units of the excitation sum ; the resulting ratio is called excitation purity and corresponds simply to distance ratios on the chromaticity diagram of a colorimetric coordinate system [49, 64, 133]. Formulas have been derived by Hardy [49] and MacAdam [91] to convert from luminance purity to excitation purity, and the reverse.

Table 7. Spectral Reflectances of Greenish Yellow Printing-ink Specimen (see fig. 4b) Read for the Selected Ordinates for Source G (see table 6)
Number X Y Z
1 0 076 0 102 0.078
2* .076 0.076 .240 0.240 .076 0.076
3 .079 .460 .076
4 .088 .615 .075
5* .096 .096 .683 .683 .075 .075
6 .117 .711 .076
7 .727 .720 .076
8* .739 .739 .725 .725 .077 .077
9 .745 .728 .077
10 .750 .731 .078
11* .758 .758 .735 .735 .080 .080
12 .765 .738 .082
13 .772 .742 .084
14* .779 .779 .745 .745 .086 .086
15 .783 .747 .088
16 .785 .750 .089
17* .787 .787 .755 .755 .091 .091
18 .788 .760 .093
19 .789 .765 .095
20* .790 .790 .772 .772 .097 .097
21 .791 .778 .100
22 .792 .782 .103
23* .793 .793 .785 .785 .106 .106
24 .795 .787 .110
25 .797 .788 .119
26* .800 .800 .790 .790 .133 .133
27 .803 .792 .155
28 .807 .796 .210
29* .812 .812 .802 .802 .342 .342
30 .819 .812 .650
Totals 19.298 6.430 21.136 7.032 3.677 1.163
Times factor 0.630 0.630 0.704 0.703 0.145 0.137

*r1Values for calculation with 10 selected ordinates.

A chart showing values for visible light
Fig. 6.Dominant wavelenth and purity evaluated from the (x,y)-chromaticity diagram.
The four points indicated by circles represent the colors of the four printing-ink specimens shown in figures 9.4 and 9.5.
Table 8. Dominant wavelengths and excitation purities of four printing-ink specimens (see fig. 4)
Hue designation of specimen Chromaticity coordinates
(from table 5c)
Dominant wave­length, nm Excita­tion purity, percent
x y
Red purple 0.430 0.239 498. 9C[4] 53.7
Greenish yellow .426 .476 573.2 74.0
Greenish blue .194 .248 483.6 49.6
Blue .190 .213 479.7 55.1

Figure 6 indicates how dominant wavelength and excitation purity of the four printing-ink specimens would be found from their chromaticity coordinates , relative to source C taken as the fixed light. Table 8 gives the dominant and complementary (C) wavelengths found as in figure 10 by the intersections of the straight lines with the spectrum locus. Table 8 also gives the excitation purities found by dividing the distance from the fixed point (source C) to the specimen point by the total distance from the fixed point to the boundary (spectrum locus plus straight line connecting its extremes). Large-scale charts for reading dominant wavelength and purity relative to source C are provided in the Hardy Handbook of Colorimetry [49].

Apparatus for the direct measurement of dominant wavelength and luminance purity has been designated by Nutting [125] and by Priest [132]. The degree of metamerism ordinarily obtained with such apparatus leaves it open to the same objections as have prevented tristimulus colorimeters with single sets of primaries from being useful for production control. There is a further disadvantage in the direct measurement of luminance purity in that the luminance of the spectrum component has to be determined relative to the luminance of the mixture by separate photometry. Since there is usually a large chromatic difference between these two fields, simple equality-of-brightness settings are not reliable, and an auxiliary flicker photometers, as in Priest's apparatus [132], must be used. This method has been found to exaggerate individual-observer differences; often-times observers will differ only slightly in the mixtures of spectrum light and fixed light that they find to be equivalent to an unknown color, but they will disagree importantly in their photomerty of the components.

  1. This was formerly called ICI for the initial letters of the English name of this commission.
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Extrapolated.
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 3.24 3.25 3.26 3.27 3.28 3.29 3.30 3.31 3.32 3.33 3.34 3.35 3.36 3.37 3.38 3.39 3.40 3.41 3.42 3.43 3.44 3.45 3.46 3.47 3.48 3.49 3.50 3.51 3.52 3.53 3.54 3.55 3.56 3.57 3.58 3.59 3.60 3.61 3.62 3.63 3.64 3.65 3.66 3.67 3.68 3.69 Values for calculation with 10 selected ordinates.
  4. C denotes complementary wavelength.