Jump to content

Combs v. United States

From Wikisource
Combs v. United States (1972)
Syllabus
4636590Combs v. United States — Syllabus1972

Supreme Court of the United States

408 U.S. 224

Combs  v.  United States

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

No. 71-517.  Argued: April 11, 1972 --- Decided: June 26, 1972

Petitioner was convicted of receiving, possessing, and concealing whiskey known by him to have been stolen from an interstate shipment. Prior to his trial, the District Court had denied a motion to suppress the whiskey from evidence on the contention that there had been no showing of probable cause to support issuance of the warrant authorizing the search for the whiskey. The petitioner raised only the validity of the warrant on his appeal, but the Court of Appeals held that he lacked standing to challenge the legality of the search, which had occurred on his father's farm where petitioner was not living or present at the time of the search.

Held: Since the Government now suggests that the warrant was invalid, and since the record is inadequate for a determination of whether petitioner had an interest in the searched premises that would afford him standing under Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364, to challenge the legality of the search, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings.

446 F. 2d 515, vacated and remanded.


James N. Perry argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was William F. Hopkins.

William Bradford Reynolds argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Petersen, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley.


PER CURIAM.