Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. Chambers

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. Chambers
by Edward Douglass White
Syllabus
831539Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. Chambers — SyllabusEdward Douglass White
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

182 U.S. 556

Commercial National Bank of Ogden  v.  Chambers

 Argued: and Submitted April 26, 1901. --- Decided: May 27, 1901

The plaintiff in error is a national banking association, doing business at Ogden City, Weber county, Utah. The action below was brought by the bank to enjoin the collection of the alleged illegal portion of certain taxes levied against its shareholders for the year 1898.

Certain provisions of the Constitution and laws of Utah which are claimed to be pertinent to the controversy are excerpted in the margin.

The substance of the complaint was that although the assessor in valuing the shares of stock of the bank deducted the proportionate amount of the assessed value of the real estate of complainant situated in the state of Utah, he neglected and refused to deduct the value of real estate owned by the bank situated without such state, and also refused to allow to certain nonresident stockholders deductions from the valuations of their shares of stock to the amount of their bona fide debts, though allowing deductions of that kind in favor of resident shareholders. Having tendered to the defendant what it claimed to be the lawful amount of the tax due from it, the bank brought this action to enjoin any attempt to collect the full amount of the tax as laid, and to compel acceptance of the sum which had been tendered. The trial court decided in favor of the bank. On appeal, however, the supreme court of the state held that the bank was not entitled to the relief prayed, and reversed the judgment in its favor with costs. Error was prosecuted to the judgment of reversal, and the cause is now in this court for review. 21 Utah, 324, 61 Pac. 560.

Mr. Abbot R. Heywood submitted the case for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. James N. Kimball and George Halverson for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice White, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court:

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse