Jump to content

Davis v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company/Concurrence Harlan

From Wikisource
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Harlan
Stewart

United States Supreme Court

379 U.S. 671

Davis  v.  Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company


Mr. Justice HARLAN, concurring.

I continue to hold the views first expressed in my separate opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 559-562, 77 S.Ct. 443, 478-479, 1 L.Ed.2d 493, and frequently reiterated since: (1) cases of this kind are not the proper business of this Court; (2) once accepted for review, however, by the votes of at least four members of the Court, I deem it my duty to participate in their decision. On this basis I join the opinion of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse