Jump to content

Department of Public Utilities v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.

From Wikisource
Department of Public Utilities v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., 194 Ark. 354 (1937)
the Arkansas Supreme Court

The Arkansas Supreme Court's decision in Department of Public Utilities v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., 194 Ark. 354 (1937), was affirmed upon appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. See 304 U.S. 61 (1938).

2836285Department of Public Utilities v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., 194 Ark. 354 (1937)1937the Arkansas Supreme Court

Supreme Court of Arkansas

194 Ark. 354

Department of Public Utilities  v.  Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Second Division

No. 4-4640.—Decided June 28, 1937. 

Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Linked cases:
304 U.S. 61
  1. INTERSTATE COMMERCE—TRANSPORTATION OF GAS THROUGH PIPE LINES—TAPS FOR LOCAL CUSTOMERS.—An order issued by the Department of Public Utilities requiring appellee to file all schedules of rates was a valid order, and was not complied with when appellee failed to file schedule of rates to consumers served along its line who desired gas for industrial purposes; and the fact that the gas entered appellee's pipe line in Louisiana to be transported into and sold in Arkansas did not alter the situation nor exempt it from state control.
  2. INTERSTATE COMMERCE—ORIGINAL PACKAGE.—The original package of gas transported from one state to another is broken when it is turned into a city distribution plant, and this class of commerce is not to be distinguished from the sales made from its pipe lines to selected customers.
  3. INTERSTATE COMMERCE.—The business of supplying on demand local consumers with gas is a local business, even though the gas be brought from another state and drawn for distribution directly from mains which might also be used for interstate purposes.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Second Division; Richard M. Mann, Judge; reversed.

Thomas Fitzhugh, for appellants.

H. C. Walker, Jr., and Moore, Gray, Burrow & Chowning, for appellee.

P. A. Lasley, amicus curiae.

[Opinion of the court by Chief Justice GRIFFIN SMITH.]

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).

A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse