Jump to content

Does Price Fixing Destroy Liberty?/Table of Cases

From Wikisource

An annotated version of this text is available.

1045798Table of CasesGeorge Howard Earle, Jr.

TABLE OF CASES.

Page
Adams vs. Tanner 58
American Tobacco Co., United States vs. 43
Ashby vs. White 163
Atkins vs. The Fibre Disintegrating Company 44
Barnardiston vs. Soame 165
Branson vs. Bush 56, 135
Brewer, United States vs. 170
Chicago, Burlington, etc., R. R. Co., etc., vs. Chicago 56, 70
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Paul Ry. Co. vs. Backus, 134
Cohen Company, United States vs. 72, 124, 126
Colgate, United States vs. 101, 102
Collins vs. Kentucky 19, 84, 138, 139
Connolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co. 52, 53, 171
Craig vs. Missouri 14, 136
Day vs. Savage 162
Delaware & Hudson Company, United States vs. 44
Fox vs. Washington 139
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company vs. Texas Packing Co. 45
Harvester Case (see International Harvester Co. vs. Kentucky).
Hamilton vs. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. 77
Harrison vs. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, 146
Hopkins vs. Lee 45, 48
International Harvester Company of America vs. Kentucky, 8, 18, 22, 27, 79, 81, 83, 84, 117, 125, 138, 139, 166, 168, 169, 170
Knight, United States vs. 14
Knowlton, et al., vs. Moore 13, 44
Knoxville (City of) vs. The Knoxville Water Co., 20, 108, 123, 166
Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Company vs. City of Lincoln, 24
Loan Assn. vs. Topeka 57
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company vs United States, 23
Loewe vs. Lawlor 150
McFarland vs. American Sugar Refining Co. 53
Malone vs. Kentucky 84
Miller vs. Strahl 139
Milligan, Ex parte 76
Mogul Steamship Co. vs. McGregor 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 106
Monongahela Navigation Company vs. United States, 133, 134, 135, 171
Myatt, United States vs. 33, 47, 72
Nash vs. United States 8, 79, 80, 82, 138, 139, 169, 170
National Cotton Oil vs. Texas 107
New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad vs. Estill 45
Nordenfelt vs. Maxim 149
Northern Pacific Railway Company vs. North Dakota 23
Northern Securities Co. vs. United States 45, 65, 108
Ohio, etc., vs. Ben Avon 67, 68, 166
Oklahoma Operating Co. vs. Love 67, 166
Omarchevarria, Secundino vs. Idaho 140
Omaha vs. Omaha Water Co. 123, 127
Patten, United States vs. 155
Pennsylvania Railroad Co., United States vs. 19, 84, 138
Pollock vs. The Farmers Loan & Trust Company 14
Prigg vs. Pennsylvania 136
Prohibition Case 77
Reading Company, United States vs. 98
Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts 14
Roberts vs. Benjamin 45
Shrader's Sons, Inc., United States vs. 102
Sharp, United States vs. 170
Smith vs. Texas 57
Spalding vs. Vilas 164
Sparf vs. United States 71
Spokane Dry Goods Co., United States vs. 72, 73, 74, 80
Standard Oil Company of New Jersey vs. United States, 14, 40, 85, 170
Trans-Missouri Freight Assn., United States vs. 125
Union Pacific R. R. Co., United States vs. 98
United States Steel Corporation, United States vs. 19, 130
United States vs. American Tobacco Company 43
United States vs. Brewer 170
United States vs. Cohen Company 72, 124, 126
United States vs. Colgate 101, 102
United States vs. Delaware and Hudson Company 44
United States vs. Knight 14
United States, Louisville & Nashville R. R. Company vs. 23
United States, Monongahela Navigation Company vs. 133, 134, 135, 171
United States vs. Myatt 33, 47, 72
United States, Nash vs. 8, 79, 80, 82, 138, 139, 169, 170
United States Northern Securities Co. vs. 45, 65, 108
United States vs. Patten 155
United States vs. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. 19, 84, 138
United States vs. Reading Company 98
United States vs. Schrader's Sons, Inc. 102
United States vs. Sharp 170
United States, Sparf vs. 71
United States vs. Spokane Dry Goods Co. 72, 73, 74, 80
United States, Standard Oil Company of New Jersey vs. 14, 40, 85, 170
United States vs. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn. 125
United States vs. Union Pacific R. R. Co. 98
United States vs. U. S. Steel Corporation 19, 130
Wadley Southern Railway Company vs. Georgia 146
Washington vs. Miller 44
Weed & Co. vs. Lockwood 54, 72, 76, 133, 134, 137, 140
Western Union Telegraph Co. vs. Hall 45
Whitwell vs. Continental Tobacco Co. 99
Wilder Mfg. Co. vs. Corn Products Refining Co. 39
Willcox vs. Consolidated Gas Company 22, 114

Lever Act (Act of Congress, approved August 10, 1917, Section 4, as amended by Section 2 of the Act approved October 22, 1919)
37

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.


The longest-living author of this work died in 1928, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 95 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse