Evola v. United States/Dissent Clark
United States Supreme Court
Natale EVOLA v. UNITED STATES. Salvatore SANTORA, Petitioner,
No. 194.
Mr. Justice CLARK, with whom Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITE join, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I realize, of course, that in remanding these cases the Court neither decides that Campbell governs nor implies how the Court of Appeals should decide them. Nevertheless, I would grant the petitions for certiorari and set these cases for argument, since it is my feeling that it is futile to remand 'for reconsideration in light of Campbell v. United States, 373 U.S. 487 (83 S.Ct. 1356, 10 L.Ed.2d 501).'
Although these cases were decided prior to Campbell, the Court of Appeals' disposition has support in the record and is worthy of argument. All the evidence before the District Court was documentary and the Court of Appeals was therefore correct in making factual determinations on the basis of such evidence.
Notes
[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse