Jump to content

First National Bank of Chicago v. United Air Lines/Dissent Frankfurter

From Wikisource
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinions
Reed
Frankfurter

United States Supreme Court

342 U.S. 396

First National Bank of Chicago  v.  United Air Lines

 Argued: Jan. 8, 1952. --- Decided: March 3, 1952


Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, dissenting.

As to any question based on diversity jurisdiction, the series of cases culminating in Woods v. Interstate Realty Co., 337 U.S. 535, 69 S.Ct. 1235, 93 L.Ed. 1524, disposes of it. As to the constitutional claim under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, I adhere to the views expressed in Hughes v. Fetter, 341 U.S. 609, 614, 71 S.Ct. 980, 983, 95 L.Ed. 1212.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse