Jump to content

Ford Motor Company v. United States/Concurrence-dissent Blackmun

From Wikisource
Ford Motor Company v. United States
Concurrence-Dissent Blackmun by Harry Blackmun
4503203Ford Motor Company v. United States — Concurrence-Dissent BlackmunHarry Blackmun
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Stewart
Concurrence/Dissents
Burger
Blackmun

[p595] MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, concurring in part and dissenting in part.


I concur in Part I of the Court's opinion and in that portion of Part II that approves divestiture as part of the remedy. I cannot agree, however, that prohibiting Ford from using its own name or its trade name on any spark plugs for five years and enjoining it entirely from manufacturing plugs for 10 years is just, equitable, or necessary. Instead, the stringency of those remedial provisions strikes me as confiscatory and punitive. The Court's opinion, ante, at 566, recognizes that Ford could develop its own spark plug division internally and place itself in the same position General Motors has occupied for so long, but that this would take from five to eight years. The restraint on Ford's entering the spark plug area is thus for a period longer than it would take Ford to achieve a position in the market through internal development. And to deny it the use of its own name is to deny it a property right that has little to do with this litigation.