Freeman v. Complex Computing Co.

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Freeman v. Complex Computing Co. (1997)
the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Syllabus
853889Freeman v. Complex Computing Co. — Syllabus1997the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Concurrence/Dissent
Godbold

119 F.3d 1044

DANIEL FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

v.

COMPLEX COMPUTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant, JASON GLAZIER, Defendant-Appellant, THOMSON TRADING SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellee

No. 96-7850, 96-7870

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.


March 24, 1997, Argued

August 7, 1997, Decided


RICHARD B. COHEN, Akabas & Cohen, New York, NY (Jeffrey T. Horvath, Akabas & Cohen, New York, NY, of counsel), for Defendant-Appellant.

BARBARA E. OLK, Trief & Olk, New York, NY (Ted Trief, Trief & Olk, New York, NY, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

JAMES F. RITTINGER, Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, New York, NY (John L. Slafsky, Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, New York, NY, of counsel), for Defendant-Cross-Appellee.

Before: NEWMAN, Chief Judge, MINER and GODBOLD,[1] Circuit Judges. Judge Godbold concurs in part, and dissents in part, in a separate opinion.

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. The Honorable John C. Godbold of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation.