Jump to content

Gassies v. Ballon/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Gassies v. Ballon
Opinion of the Court by John Marshall
683057Gassies v. Ballon — Opinion of the CourtJohn Marshall

United States Supreme Court

31 U.S. 761

Gassies  v.  Ballon


In this case the court is of opinion that the jurisdiction can be sustained. The defendant in error is alleged in the proceedings to be a citizen of the United States, naturalized in Louisiana, and residing there. This is equivalent to an averment that he is a citizen of that state. A citizen of the United States, residing in any state of the union, is a citizen of that state.

The authorities on this question have gone far enough; and this court is not disposed to narrow any more the limitations which have been imposed by the decided cases. They have gone as far as it would be reasonable and proper to go. The judgment of the district court of Louisiana is affirmed.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse