Hicks v. District of Columbia/Concurrence Harlan
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
United States Supreme Court
Eddie J. HICKS, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Argued: Oct. 21, 1965. ---
Mr. Justice HARLAN, concurring.
Among the several reasons which support the action of the Court in dismissing the writ in this case as improvidently granted, I rest my decision to join in this disposition on the lack of a record, without which I do not believe the constitutional issues tendered can properly be decided.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.
Notes
[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse