Hooker v. Los Angeles

by Melville Fuller

United States Supreme Court

188 U.S. 314

Hooker  v.  Los Angeles

 Argued: January 23, 1903. --- Decided: February 23, 1903

This is a writ of error to the supreme court of the state of California to review a judgment of that court affirming the judgment of the superior court of the county of Los Angeles, California, in favor of the city of Los Angeles, and against Hooker and Pomeroy. The city brought suit against Hooker and Pomeroy, to condemn all their 'estate, right, title, and interest' in and to certain tracts of land, described in the complaint, for the purpose of enabling the city 'to construct and maintain thereon the 'headworks' of its projected system for supplying water to its inhabitants for private and municipal purposes.' All questions except the amount of compensation to be awarded were by stipulation tried by the court. The jury returned a verdict awarding $23,000 as the value 'of an estate in fee simple in the lands described in the complaint, including all their elements of value, subject to the paramount right of the city of Los Angeles to take from the Los Angeles river, from time to time, all the water that may be needed at such time for the use of the inhabitants of said city, and for all municipal and public uses and purposes therein,' and $2,000 as damages to the remaining portion of the tract of which that land formed a part. Judgment was rendered thereon for the amount so found, and costs. The case was carried to the supreme court, and the judgment affirmed. 124 Cal. 597, 57 Pac. 585.

Messrs. J. S.C.hapman, John Garber, R. H. F. Variel, and J. G. North for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. John F. Dillon, J. R. Scott, Henry T. Lee, Harry Hubbard, John M. Dillon, and W. B. Mathews for defendants.

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

Notes