Hubbert v. Campbellsville Lumber Company

by David Josiah Brewer

United States Supreme Court

191 U.S. 70

Hubbert  v.  Campbellsville Lumber Company

 Argued: October 20, 1903. --- Decided: November 9, 1903

On March 18, 1878, the general assembly of Kentucky passed an act authorizing the county of Taylor to compromise its debts and issue new bonds of the county not exceeding in amount $125,000, and also authorizing the circuit court, in case of a judgment on any of such bonds and a refusal by the county within thirty days to levy a tax sufficient to pay it, to make an order based on the last previous assessment, levying a tax and appointing a collector. On February 27, 1882, an amendatory act was passed increasing the issuable amount to $150,000, providing that any judgment rendered thereon should constitute a lien on all the real and personal property in the county subject to taxation, and also that, if the court rendering the judgment should be of opinion that such serious obstruction was likely to be offered as would materially delay the enforcement of the judgment, it should refer the matter to a commissioner, with instructions to ascertain and report the amount proportionally necessary for the holders or owners of any such property to pay in order to raise promptly a sum sufficient to pay the judgment. Personal judgments were authorized against the parties found to be the owners of property within the limits of the county, to be enforced by executions as other personal judgments. Section 10 reads as follows:

'Sec. 10. The bonds to be issued under the act to which this is an amendment shall, on their face, stipulate that the holders of any of them, or any coupon thereof, shall be entitled to the remedies for the collection of the same herein, and in the act to which this is an amendment, provided for.'

Bonds were issued by the county, some of which passed into the possession of the plaintiff, who brought suit and obtained judgment against the county in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kentucky.

The bonds did not contain the stipulation referred to in § 10, but did contain the following recital:

'This is one of an issue amounting in all to $125,000, authorized by an act of the general assembly of the commonwealth of Kentucky, approved March 18, 1878.'

Each bond also bore the following endorsement:

'Issued by authority of an act of the general assembly of the state of Kentucky, approved March 18, 1878.'

On application for further relief the circuit court awarded to the plaintiff the benefit of the special provisions of the amendatory act of 1882, but the circuit court of appeals held that he was not entitled to them. 50 C. C. A. 435, 112 Fed. 718. Thereupon the case was brought here on certiorari. 186 U.S. 485, 46 L. ed. 1260, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 856.

Mr. W. O. Harris for petitioner.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 71-73 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Ernest Macpherson for respondent.

Statement by Mr. Justice Brewer:

[Argument of Counsel from pages 73-75 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

Notes