Kossick v. United Fruit Company/Dissent Whittaker
United States Supreme Court
Kossick v. United Fruit Company
Argued: Feb. 20, 1961. --- Decided: April 17, 1961
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER, dissenting.
Like the Court of Appeals, 275 F.2d 500, I think the oral contract here claimed by petitioner was not a maritime but a New York contract and barred by its statute of frauds. New York Personal Property Law, § 31, par. 2. I therefore dissent.
Notes
[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse