Lambert v. California

←

Lambert v. California
the Supreme Court of the United States

Syllabus

→

related portals: Supreme Court of the United States

Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 225 (1957), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the acceptability of ignorance of the law as an excuse for a crime. The court held that in order to be punished, there must be a probability that the accused party had knowledge of the law before committing the crime. Warning: template has been deprecated.

913907Lambert v. California — Syllabusthe Supreme Court of the United States

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion: Frankfurter

Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

355 U.S. 225

Lambert v. California

Argued: Oct. 16, 17, 1957. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1957

See 355 U.S. 937, 78 S.Ct. 410.

Mr. Samuel C. McMorris, Los Angeles, Cal., for the appellant.

Mr. Warren M. Christopher, Los Angeles, Cal., as amicus curiae.

Messrs. Philip E. Grey, Los Angeles, Cal., and Clarence, A. Linn, San Francisco, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse