Jump to content

Lathrop v. Donohue/Concurrence Whittaker

From Wikisource
920259Lathrop v. Donohue — ConcurrenceCharles Evans Whittaker
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Whittaker
Dissenting Opinions
Black
Douglas

United States Supreme Court

367 U.S. 820

Lathrop  v.  Donohue

 Argued: Jan. 18, 1961. --- Decided: June 19, 1961


Mr. Justice WHITTAKER, concurring in result.

Believing that the State's requirement that a lawyer pay to its designee an annual fee of $15 as a condition of its grant, or of continuing its grant, to him of the special privilege (which is what it is) of practicing law in the State-which is really all that is involved here-does not violate any provision of the United States Constitution, I concur in the judgment.

Mr. Justice BLACK, dissenting.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse