Jump to content

Lee v. Washington

From Wikisource
Lee v. Washington
Syllabus
932377Lee v. Washington — Syllabus

United States Supreme Court

390 U.S. 333

Lee, Commissioner of Corrections of Alabama, et al.  v.  Washington et al.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

No. 75.  Argued: November 7, 1967 --- Decided: March 11, 1968

A three-judge District Court declared Alabama statutes requiring racial segregation in prisons unconstitutional and established a schedule for desegregation. The State's challenges of the judgment based on Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23 (relating to class actions), the claimed constitutionality of the statutes, and the failure to allow for necessary prison security and discipline, held to be without merit.

263 F. Supp. 327, affirmed.


Nicholas S. Hare, Special Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General, Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorney General, and J. M. Breckenridge.

Charles Morgan, Jr., argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Orzell Billingsley, Jr., and Melvin L. Wulf.


PER CURIAM.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse