Jump to content

Louisiana Power & Light Company v. City of Thibodaux/Concurrence Stewart

From Wikisource
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Stewart
Dissenting Opinion
Brennan

United States Supreme Court

360 U.S. 25

Louisiana Power & Light Company  v.  City of Thibodaux

 Argued: April 2, 1959. --- Decided: June 8, 1959


Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring.

In a conscientious effort to do justice the District Court deferred immediate adjudication of this controversy pending authoritative clarification of a controlling state statute of highly doubtful meaning. Under the circumstances presented, I think the course pursued was clearly within the District Court's allowable discretion. For that reason I concur in the judgment.

This case is totally unlike County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co., 360 U.S. 185, 79 S.Ct. 1060, except for the coincidence that both cases involve eminent domain proceedings. In Mashuda the Court holds that it was error for the District Court to dismiss the complaint. The Court further holds in that case that, since the controlling state law is clear and only factual issues need be resolved, there is no occasion in the interest of justice to refrain from prompt adjudication.

Mr. Justice BRENNAN, with whom The CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS join, dissenting.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse