Jump to content

McBride v. Toledo Terminal Railroad Company/Dissent Burton

From Wikisource
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinions
Frankfurter
Burton

United States Supreme Court

354 U.S. 517

McBride  v.  Toledo Terminal Railroad Company


Mr. Justice BURTON, dissenting.

For the reasons stated by the Supreme Court of Ohio, 166 Ohio St. 129, 140 N.E.2d 319, I believe that petitioner's injuries were not caused, 'in whole or in part,' by the possible inadequacy of the lighting.

Mr. Justice HARLAN, with whom Mr. Justice WHITTAKER joins, dissents for the reasons given in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 1957, 352 U.S. 500, 559, 77 S.Ct. 443.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse