McKinnie v. Tennessee/Opinion of the Court
The judgment is reversed. Hamm v. City of Rock Hill and Lupper v. Arkansas, 379 U.S. 306, 85 S.Ct. 384, 13 L.Ed.2d 300.
Mr. Justice STEWART would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Tennessee for reconsideration in the light of supervening federal legislation, in accordance with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U.S. 306, 326, 85 S.Ct. 384, 396.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice HARLAN, and Mr. Justice WHITE would affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U.S. 306, 318, 322 327, 85 S.Ct. 384, 392, 394, 397.
Notes
[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse