Jump to content

Milton v. Wainwright

From Wikisource
Milton v. Wainwright (1972)
Syllabus
4605154Milton v. Wainwright — Syllabus1972
Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
Stewart

Supreme Court of the United States

407 U.S. 371

Milton  v.  Wainwright, Corrections Director

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

No. 70-5012.  Argued: January 12, 1972 --- Decided: June 22, 1972

Petitioner in this habeas corpus proceeding challenged on Fifth and Sixth Amendment grounds the introduction at his trial of a post-indictment, pretrial confession he made to a police officer posing as a fellow prisoner. The denial of habeas corpus relief is affirmed without reaching the merits of petitioner's claims; any possible error in the admission of the challenged confession was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of three other unchallenged confessions and strong corroborative evidence of petitioner's guilt. Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250; Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18. Pp. 372-378.

428 F. 2d 463, affirmed.


BURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which WHITE, BLACKMUN, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. STEWART, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 378.


Neil P. Rutledge, by appointment of the Court, 403 U.S. 951, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

J. Robert Olian, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause forrespondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief was Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General.