Jump to content

Mitchell v. United States (368 U.S. 439)/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
920599Mitchell v. United States (368 U.S. 439) — Opinion of the Court
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Clark

United States Supreme Court

368 U.S. 439

Mitchell  v.  United States (368 U.S. 439)

 Argued: Jan. 22, 1962. ---


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari, which presents the question whether materially false testimony was used against petitioner at the trial, are granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing upon petitioner's motion, treated as a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Cf. Mesarosh v. United States, 352 U.S. 1, 77 S.Ct. 1, 1 L.Ed.2d 1. We, of course, intimate no view upon the merits of the motion.

Motion granted.

Mr. Justice CLARK, with whom Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART join, dissenting.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse