Jump to content

Murray v. Wilson Distilling Company

From Wikisource


Murray v. Wilson Distilling Company
by Edward Douglass White
Syllabus
843703Murray v. Wilson Distilling Company — SyllabusEdward Douglass White
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

213 U.S. 151

Murray  v.  Wilson Distilling Company

 Argued: February 26 and March 1, 1909. --- Decided: April 5, 1909

Messrs. B. L. Abney, with whom Mr. J. Fraser Lyon was on the brief, and Mr. W. F. Stevenson, for petitioners:

[Argument of Counsel from pages 152-154 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Danial Rountree, with whom Mr. Clifford L. Anderson and Mr. Thomas B. Felder were on the brief, also aruged for petitioners.

Mr. Alfred S. Barnard, with whom Mr. George B. Lester was on the brief, for respondent, the Fleischmann Company:

[Argument of Counsel from pages 154-157 intentionally omitted]

Mr. T. Moultrie Mordecai, with whom Mr. Frank Carter, Mr. Simeon Hyde, and H. C. Chedester were on the brief, for respondents, the Wilson Distilling Company.

Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse