Jump to content

NLRB v. International Van Lines

From Wikisource
NLRB v. International Van Lines (1972)
Syllabus
4670036NLRB v. International Van Lines — Syllabus1972
Court Documents
Concurring Opinion
Blackmun

Supreme Court of the United States

409 U.S. 48

National Labor Relations Board  v.  International Van Lines

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

No. 71-895.  Argued: October 12, 1972 --- Decided: November 7, 1972

Four employees of respondent refused to cross a picket line formed in connection with a union's organization campaign. Respondent thereafter advised the employees that because of their failure to report to work they were being permanently replaced, which was not true at the time of the discharges. When respondent refused reinstatement, charges were filed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Concluding that the discharges were unfair labor practices under the National Labor Relations Act, and that the employees thereby became unfair labor practice strikers, the NLRB ordered unconditional reinstatement with back pay. The Court of Appeals reversed that portion of the NLRB's order, holding that the employees were not unfair labor practice strikers, who were entitled to unconditional reinstatement, but economic strikers, who were not entitled to reinstatement if the employer had substantial business justifications for refusing to rehire them.

Held: The unconditional reinstatement of the employees was proper since their discriminatory discharges prior to the time their places were filled constituted unfair labor practices regardless of whether they were economic strikers or unfair labor practice strikers. Pp. 52-53.

448 F. 2d 905, reversed in part.


STEWART, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, post, p. 53.


Peter G. Nash argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Samuel Huntington, Patrick Hardin, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher.

Norman H. Kirshman argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Louis R. Garcia.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed by J. Albert Woll, Laurence Gold, and Thomas E. Harris for the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, and by Milton Smith, Jerry Kronenberg, and Gerard C. Smetana for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States.