Nanostructural Organization of Naturally Occurring Composites—Part II: Silica-Chitin-Based Biocomposites
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2008, Article ID 670235, 8 pages
doi:10.1155/2008/670235
Research Article
Nanostructural Organization of Naturally Occurring Composites—Part II: Silica-Chitin-Based Biocomposites
[edit]Hermann Ehrlich,1 Dorte Janussen,2 Paul Simon,3 Vasily V. Bazhenov,4 Nikolay P. Shapkin,4 Christiane Erler,1 Michael Mertig,1 René Born,1 Sascha Heinemann,1 Thomas Hanke,1 Hartmut Worch,1 and John N. Vournakis5
1 Max Bergmann Center of Biomaterials and Institute of Materials Science, Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany
2 Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
3 Max Planck Institute of Chemical Physics of Solids, 01187 Dresden, Germany
4 Institute of Chemistry and Applied Ecology, Far Eastern National University, 690650 Vladivostok, Russia
5 Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc., Danvers, MA 01923, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to Hermann Ehrlich, hermann.ehrlich@tu-dresden.de
Received 2 November 2007; Accepted 26 February 2008
Recommended by Donglu Shi
Investigations of the micro- and nanostructures and chemical composition of the sponge skeletons as examples for natural structural biocomposites are of fundamental scientific relevance. Recently, we show that some demosponges (Verongula gigantea, Aplysina sp.) and glass sponges (Farrea occa, Euplectella aspergillum) possess chitin as a component of their skeletons. The main practical approach we used for chitin isolation was based on alkali treatment of corresponding external layers of spicules sponge material with the aim of obtaining alkali-resistant compounds for detailed analysis. Here, we present a detailed study of the structural and physicochemical properties of spicules of the glass sponge Rossella fibulata. The structural similarity of chitin derived from this sponge to invertebrate alpha chitin has been confirmed by us unambiguously using physicochemical and biochemical methods. This is the first report of a silica-chitin composite biomaterial found in Rossella species. Finally, the present work includes a discussion related to strategies for the practical application of silica-chitin-based composites as biomaterials.
Copyright © 2008 Hermann Ehrlich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. INTRODUCTION
[edit]This is the second paper on naturally occurring silica-based
biocomposites of sponges origin. The initial paper [1] studied the presence of fibrillar collagen as a component of glassy
anchoring spicule of Monorphaphis sp. glass sponge.
Biocomposites of marine origin including sponge skeletal formations are a constant source of inspiration for finding
solutions to a variety of technical challenges in bionics, architecture, optics, engineering, as well as materials science and
biomedicine (reviewed in [2, 3]). The biomimetic potential
of marine sponges seems to be a goldmine to material scientists. Several main aspects relating to sponges as biomaterials
and biocomposites are recently described as follows [3]:
(i) hexactinellid spicules as natural glass-based composites with specific mechanical properties [4, 5];
(ii) skeleton of Euplectella sp. (Hexactinellida) as a hierarchical natural structural material of remarkable design [6, 7];
(iii) basal spicules of Hexactinellida as biological glass fibers with specific optical properties [8–10];
(iv) silicatein-based biocatalitic formation of nanocomposite materials (reviewed in [11]);
(v) biomimetically inspired hybrid materials based on silicified sponge collagen [12–14].
In case of hexactinellid spicules, it is reported that they are highly flexible and tough, possibly not only because of their layered structure and the hydrated nature of the silica as suggested earlier [15], but of the presence of collagen [16] or chitin [17]. According to paleontological and molecular data, the sponge class Hexactinellida may be the oldest
Figure 1: Highly flexible spicules of marine glass sponge Rossella fibulata (a). Pieces of clean spicules were placed in deionized water and disrupted using magnet stirrer. Visual observations show that the water solution became of a milky color typical for colloidal suspensions of silica (b). Silica nanoparticles are associated around oriented organic matrix of nanofibrillar nature (c). Transparent hard glassy spheres were obtained using this fraction of colloidal suspension after dropping into 99% TMOS solution at room temperature (d).
metazoan taxon in earth’s history [18, 19]. Recently, we suggested that silica-chitin scaffolds may be key templates for skeleton formation also in ancestral unicellular organisms, rather than silica-protein composites [17]. From this point of view, we hypothesized that chitin molecules are probably part of very old organic template system involved in a biosilicification phenomenon, which was established a long time before the origin of glass sponges and collagen as structural protein with respect to high templating activity for biomineralization. The objective of the current study was to test the hypothesis that chitin is an essential component of the silica spicules of Antarctic glass sponge Rossella fibulata (Figure 1(a)) as well, and if so, to unravel its involvement in the mechanical behavior of these spicules. Nanomechanical properties, nanohardness and elastic modulus, of a closely related sponge Rossella racovitzea were determined previously by using a vertical indentation system attached to an atomic force microscope [15] The Rossella spicules, known to have optical wave conduction properties, are 10–20 cm long with a circular cross-section of diameter 200–600 μm. The spicules are composed of 2–10 μm-thick layers of siliceous material that has no detectable crystallinity. Measurements through the thickness of the spicules indicated uniform properties regardless of layering. Both the elastic modulus and nanohardness values of the spicules are about half of that of either fused silica or commercial glass optical fibers. The fracture strength and fracture energy of the spicules, determined by 3-point bend tests, are several times those of silica rods of similar diameter. The spicules offer bioinspired lessons for potential biomimetic design of optical fibers with long-term durability that could potentially be fabricated at room temperature in aqueous solutions [8]. Unfortunately, the nature and origin of organic matrix were not investigated in these pioneering studies. We decided also to re-examine the results of some previously reported studies concerning the presence of polysaccharides within silica-containing spicules of another hexactinellid sponge. For example, Travis et al. [20] reported the presence of parallel-oriented cellulose-like filaments with an average width of 1.9 nm observed in organic matrix material after HF-based desilicification of the spicules of hexactinel-
lid Euplectella sp. These matrices also contain considerable amounts of hexosamine. In this study, we performed structural, spectroscopic, and biochemical analysis of organic matrix isolated from spicules of R. fibulata. Finally, the present work includes a discussion relating to strategies for the practical application of silicachitin- and silica- N-acethyl glucosamine (NAG)-based composites as biomaterials.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
[edit]2.1. Chemical etching of glass sponge skeletons
[edit]The object of our study was Rossella fibulata Schulze & Kirkpatrick, 1910 (Hexactinellida: Porifera), collected in 2005 in the Scotia Sea, Antarctic, at a depth of 200 m. Spicules of R. fibulata were treated according to the following procedure. Sponge material of R. fibulata was stored for several days in fresh sea-water. The sponge was dried afterwards for 4 days at 45◦ C. Finally, the sponge skeleton was cleaned in 10% H2 O2 and dried again at 45◦ C. Tissue-free dried sponge material was washed three times in distilled water, cut into 3 cm long pieces and placed in a solution containing purified Clostridium histolyticum collagenase (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, USA) to digest any possible collagen contamination of exogenous nature. After incubation for 24 hours at 15◦ C, the pieces of glass sponge skeleton were again washed three times in distilled water, dried, and placed in a 15 mL vessel containing chitinase solution (as described below) to digest any possible exogenous chitin contaminations. After incubation for 48 hours at 25◦ C, fragments of skeleton were again washed, dried, and placed in 10 mL plastic vessel containing 8 mL 2.5 M NaOH solution. The vessel was covered and placed under thermostatic conditions at 37◦ C without shaking. The effectiveness of the alkali etching was also monitored using optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at different locations along the length of the spicular material and within the cross-sectional area. The colourless alkali-insoluble material obtained after alkali treatment of the glass sponge samples was washed with distilled water five times and finally dialysed against deionized water on Roth
(Germany) membranes with a MWCO of 14 kDa. Dialysis was performed for 5 days at 4°C. The dialyzed material was dried at room temperature and used for structural and analytical investigations.
2.2. Development of the silica nanoparticular fraction using mechanical disruption of cleaned R. fibulata spicules.
[edit]The spicules of R. fibulata were treated using enzymes as described above, cleaned, dialysed, and cut in 3 cm long pieces. These fragments of clean spicules were placed in deionized water and disrupted mechanically using glass covered stirring bars (25 × 6 mm) and magnet stirrer during 24 hours at 25◦ C. After centrifugation (1500× g) for 5 minutes the debris of mechanically disrupted spicules was collected and milky colour supernatant was carefully decanted. Obtained debrisfree suspension (Figure 1(b)) was used for SEM and TEM investigations.
2.3. FTIR spectroscopy
[edit]IR spectra were recorded with a Perkin Elmer FTIR Spectrometer Spectrum 2000, equipped with an AutoImage Microscope using the FT-IRRAS technique (Fourier transform infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy) as described previously [21].
2.4. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
[edit]Conventional transmission electron microscopy [1] was performed with a Philips CM200 FEGST Lorentz electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. For electron microscopy, a drop of the water suspension containing the sample was placed on the electron microscopy grid. After one minute, the excess was removed using blotting paper and thereafter dried in air. The electron microscopy grids (Plano, Germany) were covered with a holey carbon film.
2.5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis
[edit]The samples were fixed in a sample holder and covered with carbon, or with a gold layer for 1 minute using an Edwards S150B sputter coater. The samples were then placed in an ESEM XL 30 Philips or LEO DSM 982 Gemini scanning electron microscope.
2.6. Chitinase digestion and test
[edit]Dried 20 mg samples of purified sponge spicules, previously pulverized to a fine powder in an agat mortar, were suspended in 400 μL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer at pH 6.5. Positive control was prepared by solubilizing 0.3% colloidal chitin in the same buffer. Equal amounts of 1 mg/mL of three chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14 and EC 3.2.1.30): N-acetyl-βglucosaminidase from Trichoderma viride (Sigma-Aldrich) number C-8241, and two poly (1,4-β-[2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucoside]) glycanohydrolases from Serratia marcescens (Sigma-Aldrich) number. C-7809 and Streptomyces griseus (Sigma-Aldrich) number. C-6137, respectively, were suspended in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.0. Digestion was started by mixing 400 μL of the samples and 400 μL of the chitinase-mix. Incubation was performed at 37◦ C and stopped after 114 hours by adding 400 μL of 1% NaOH, followed by boiling for 5 minutes. The effectiveness of the enzymatic degradation was monitored using optical microscopy (Zeis, Axiovert). The Morgan-Elson assay was used to quantify the N-acetylglucosamin released after chitinase treatment as described previously [22]. The sample which contains chitinase solution without substrate was used as a control.
2.7. Preparation of α-chitin
[edit]Alpha-chitin was prepared from a commercially available crab shell chitin (Fluka). The material was purified with aqueous 1 M HCl for 2 hours at 25◦ C and then refluxed in 2 M NaOH for 48 hours at 25◦ C. The resulting α-chitin was washed in deionized water by several centrifugations until neutrality was reached. The whole procedure was repeated twice. α-chitin was also used as a standard for FTIR and for Fourier transform (HRTEM) studies.
2.8. Preparation of colloidal chitin
[edit]Ten grams of α-chitin (Fluka) was mixed with 500 mL of 85% phosphoric acid and stirred for 24 hours at 4◦ C. The suspension was poured into 5 L of distilled water (DW) and centrifuged (15000× g for 15 minutes). The resulting precipitate was washed with DW until the pH reached 5.0 and then neutralized by addition of 6 N NaOH. The suspension was centrifuged (15000× g for 15 minutes) and washed with 3 L of DW for desalting. The resulting precipitate was suspended in DW and dialyzed. The chitin content in the suspension was determined by drying a sample.
2.9. Silicification of colloidal chitin and NAG
[edit]In the first step, 0.93 g of colloidal chitin or NAG (SigmaAldrich, Miss, USA) previously suspended in 34.6 g of methanol was added to 51.8 mL of deionized water. The suspension pH was then raised above 10 with the addition of 100 μL of 1 N NaOH solution. Finally, 169 μL of tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS, 99 wt%, ABCR GmbH, Germany) were added and the solution was stirred at room temperature. After 1 hour the suspension was filtered and the recovered precipitate rinsed with deionized water, then with methanol, and finally air-dried.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
[edit]Most of the glass sponges inhabit soft muddy substrates. One of the strategies of survival under such conditions is the formation of root structures that prevent the body of the animal from sinking into the ground [23]. Due to their preferred deep-sea habitat, the Hexactinellida have been poorly investigated with respect to their general biology [24, 25] and the nature of organic components which build their skeletal
Figure 2: TEM images of silica-organic matrix-based suspension obtained after mechanical disruption of spicules in deionized water (a). Crystallites of organic nature are embedded in amorphous silica (b).
structures. It was generally accepted that their skeletons are composed of concentric layers of amorphous hydrated silica, containing varying amounts of organic material [26, 27] deposited around a proteinaceous axial filament [28, 29].
The finding of collagen within basal spicules of H. sieboldi
[12, 16] and chitin in skeletons of F. occa [17] and in spicules
of E. aspergillum [3], stimulated our attempts to find materials of organic nature in other species of glass sponges. In the case of R. fibulata, we have not observed any visible signs of
demineralization of these materials using optical microscopy and SEM after 14 days and at the similar experimental conditions as in the study on H. sieboldi and Monorhaphis sp.
On the contrary, spicules of R. fibulata show high resistance
to alkali treatment even after 3 months of demineralization.
This was similar the resistance observed for E. aspergillum
[3]. This phenomenon led us to the assumption that siliceous
skeletons of investigated sponges possess a material which
protects amorphous silica from dissolution in alkali, and is
highly resistant to alkali digestion. It is well known that chitin
in alkali is stable with respect to degradation [30]. Correspondingly, in our experiments, chitin was the first candidate
for a biomaterial with this property.
Initially, we performed experiments on mechanical disruption of cleaned R. fibulata spicules (Figure 1(a)) in deionized water as described above. This method of desintegration
of spicules was very effective. Visual observations show that
water solution became of a milky color typical for silica colloidal suspensions (Figure 1(b)) even after 6 hours. Debrisfree suspensions obtained in this way were stable during 3-4
days. SEM of the suspensions confirmed their nanoparticular structure (Figure 1(c)). Silica nanoparticles of diameter
between 20 and 35 nm are associated around oriented organic matrix of nanofibrillar nature as shown in Figure 1(c).
To verify whether this kind of silica-organic matrix obtained
from the colloidal suspension mimic the biosilicification, we
carried out in vitro experiments in which we exposed it to
silicic acid solution derived from TMOS. We developed hard
and transparent glassy spheres (Figure 1(d)) which were stable in water and in air during several months. TEM investigation of these colloidal suspensions (Figure 2(a)) used for the development of spherical glassy
Figure 3: FTIR spectra of organic matrix isolated after desilicification of R. fibulata spicules show strong evidence for β-1, 4glycosodic linkage at 890–896 cm−1 and for ether bond in pyranose ring at 1153–1157 cm−1 (arrows).There is no evidence for the presence of Si–O–Si bonds.
Figure 4: High-resolution transmission electron microscopy image of the fragment of isolated chitin nanofibril (a); the arrows indicate the presence of crystallite-like structures with a diameter which corresponds to that of chitin crystallites (2 nm). AFM micrograph of chitin nanofibrillar matrix (b).
materials clearly revealed that organic crystallites of approximately 3 nm in diameter are embedded in amorphous silica
matrix. Observed HRTEM image (Figure 2(b)) is highly
similar to previously reported HRTEM images of chitin
nanocrystallites of the same diameter [31]. Therefore, in
following experiments it was decided to isolate organic
matrix from silica-containing spicules of R. fibulata using a
desilicification procedure based on alkali treatment [16, 17].
To test our hypothesis that alkali-insoluble residues of R.
fibulata spicules are of chitinous nature, we carried out different highly sensitive structural and biochemical analysis as
described below.
FTIR observation of purified, dialysed, and dried samples
of the alkali-insoluble organic matrix isolated after demineralization of R. fibulata spicules (Figure 3) confirmed occurrence of pyranose rings and β-1, 4 linkages, with peaks at
1156 cm−1 and at 894 cm−1 very similar to those of α-chitin.
It was reported previously that the spectral feature between
1153 and 1157 cm−1 is mainly associated with an ether bond
in a pyranose ring [32, 33]. The β-linkage was also indicated
Figure 5: Proposed model of nanostructural organization of the naturally occurring silica-chitin composite unit (a) isolated from spicules of R. fibulata. Silica nanoparticles tightly surround chitinous nanofibrils (b). Schematic view (c) shows a possible nanodistribution of silica on the surface of chitinous nanofibril. Image (d) represents the hypothetic scheme of interaction between silica and poly-N-acetyl glucosaminefragment of the chitin nanofibril and formation of the corresponding hydrogen bonds.
Because sponges are often regarded as the most ancient metazoans (630 to 542 My) [45, 46], the finding of chitin within skeletal formations of these organisms is of major scientific significance, since it gives important indications to the
basic pattern of the Metazoa. As chitin also serves as a template for calcium carbonate deposition in sponges [21], this suggests that the evolution of mineralized skeletons in early metazoans share a common origin with respect to chitin as a unified template for biomineralization, similar to collagen as common structural protein in nature [12]. This feature
Figure 6: Crystals of N-acetyl glucosamine obtained from solution (a) could be also visualized using SEM even if being included into amorphous silica matrix (b). SEM image (d) revealed strong evidence that oriented crystals of NAG are observed in form of nanocrystals compactly embedded within this matrix. Light micrograph (c) of the silica-NAG spherical composites, which are highly stable in water-containing solutions.
may be considered a basic metazoan character and thus also has implications for the question of establishing the monophyletic status of the taxon Metazoa.
A comprehensive understanding of silica-chitin-based sponge skeletons with respect to chemical composition and structure may prove to be a novel model for the biomimetic synthesis also of N-acetyl glucosamine (NAG) and poly-NAG-based composites analogous to well established chitosan-silica hybrid materials [47, 48] with very attractive bioactive properties for applications in biomedicine.
It was reported [49] that silicon was found to be a constituent of certain glycosaminoglycans. It was concluded that Si is present as silanolate, that is, an ether (or ester-like) derivative of orthosilicic acid, and that R1 –O–Si–O–R2 bridges play a role in the structural organisation of glycosaminoglycans. Thus Si may function as a biological cross-linking agent and contribute to architecture and resilience of connective tissue [49].
To test our hypothesis that also NAG as monomer unit of poly-NAG and chitin could be used as substrate for silicification, we obtained silica-NAG-based materials in the form of rods or spheres (Figure 6) using TMOS and solgel techniquesin vitroas described in Section 2. The diameter of these spheres could be varied between 2 and 10 mm. SEM investigations on micro- and nanostructural organization of silica-NAG composites revealed strong evidence that oriented nanocrytals of NAG (Figure 6(a)) could be also observed in form of nanocrystals compactly embedded within amorphous silica matrix (Figures 6(b) and 6(d)). Probably this kind of NAG nanodistribution is responsible for observed high mechanical stability and resistance of these
intercalated chitosan/layered silicate nanocomposites prepared to develop robust and stable sensors useful for anionic detection in aqueous media as reported on [50, 51]. We suggest that silica-chitin and silica-NAG (-poly NAG) composites could be highly optimized biocompatible structures that would support and organize functional tissues if applied in tissue engineering of bone and cartilage replacements similar to silica-chitosan-based biomaterials [52]. Experiments on biocompatibility of silica-chitin and silicaNAG composites derived in vitro are currently in progress.
4. CONCLUSION
[edit]Chitin and poly-N-acetyl glucosamine are well investigated materials of biological origin with wide fields of application in biomedicine because of their unique multifunctional engineering mechanical properties and biocompatibility [53–56]. With respect to polysaccharides, including sponge chitin, it is theoretically possible that inorganic Si binds after the macromolecular structure has been formed. An alternative, more plausible from stereochemical considerations [49], would consist in the incorporation of preformed mono-or disaccharide Si derivatives during the synthesis of the polysaccharide chain. The finding of nanostructured silica-chitin biocomposites as structural scaffolds of glass sponge skeletons introduces a new aspect into the discussion surrounding the chemistry, diversity, and nanolocalization of these materials. Chitin as a template for biomineralization probably belongs to the basic pattern of the Metazoa.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
[edit]This work was partially supported by a joint RussianGerman program “DAAD-Mikhail Lomonosov.” We thank Professor H. Lichte for the possibility to use the facilities at the Special Electron Microscopy Laboratory for highresolution and holography at Triebenberg, TU Dresden, Germany. The authors are deeply grateful to Mariana Tasso, Heike Meissner, Gert Richter, Axel Mensch, and Ortrud Trommer for helpful technical assistance.
REFERENCES
[edit][1] H. Ehrlich, S. Heinemann, C. Heinemann, et al., “Nanostructiral organization of naturally occuring composites. Part I. Silica-collagen-based biocomposites,” Journal of Nanomaterials. In press.
[2] P. Fratzl, “Biomimetic materials research: what can we really learn from nature’s structural materials?” Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 637–642, 2007.
[3] H. Ehrlich and H. Worch, “Sponges as natural composites: from biomimetic potential to development of new biomaterials,” in Porifera Research-Biodiversity, Innovation & Sustainability, M. R. Custodio, G. Lobo-Hajdu, E. Hajdu, and G. Muricy, Eds., Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2007.
[4] G. Mayer, “Rigid biological systems as models for synthetic composites,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5751, pp. 1144–1147, 2005.
[5] S. L. Walter, B. D. Flinn, and G. Mayer, “Mechanisms of toughening of a natural rigid composite,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 570–574, 2007.
[6] J. Aizenberg, J. C. Weaver, M. S. Thanawala, V. C. Sundar, D. E. Morse, and P. Fratzl, “Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: structural hierarchy from the nanoscale to the macroscale,” Science, vol. 309, no. 5732, pp. 275–278, 2005.
[7] J. C. Weaver, J. Aizenberg, G. E. Fantner, et al., “Hierarchical assembly of the siliceous skeletal lattice of the hexactinellid sponge Euplectella aspergillum ,” Journal of Structural Biology,
vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 93–106, 2007.
[8] R. Cuttaneo-Vietti, G. Bavestrello, C. Cerrano, et al., “Optical
fibres in an Antarctic sponge,” Nature, vol. 383, no. 6599, pp.
397–398, 1996.
[9] J. Aizenberg, V. C. Sundar, A. D. Yablon, J. C. Weaver, and G.
Chen, “Biological glass fibers: correlation between optical and
structural properties,” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 10, pp.
3358–3363, 2004.
[10] W. E. G. Müller, K. Wendt, C. Geppert, M. Wiens, A. Reiber,
and H. C. Schröder, “Novel photoreception system in sponges?
Unique transmission properties of the stalk spicules from the
hexactinellid Hyalonema sieboldi ,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1149–1155, 2006.
[11] H. C. Schröder, D. Brandt, U. Schloßmacher, et al., “Enzymatic
production of biosilica glass using enzymes from sponges: basic aspects and application in nanobiotechnology (material sciences and medicine),” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 94, no. 5,
pp. 339–359, 2007.
[12] H. Ehrlich and H. Worch, “Collagen, a huge matrix in glasssponge flexible spicules of the meter-long Hyalonema sieboldi,” in Handbook of Biomineralization Vol.1. The Biology of Biominerals Structure Formation, E. Bäuerlein, Ed., Wiley VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2007.
[13] S. Heinemann, H. Ehrlich, C. Knieb, and T. Hanke, “Biomimetically inspired hybrid materials based on silicified collagen,” International Journal of Materials Research, vol. 98,
no. 7, pp. 603–608, 2007.
[14] S. Heinemann, C. Knieb, H. Ehrlich, et al., “A novel
biomimetic hybrid material made of silicified collagen: perspectives for bone replacement,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1061–1068, 2007.
[15] M. Sarikaya, H. Fong, N. Sunderland, et al., “Biomimetic
model of a sponge-spicular optical fiber-mechanical properties and structure,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1420–1428, 2001.
[16] H. Ehrlich, A. Ereskovsky, A. L. Drozdov, et al., “A modern approach to demineralization of spicules in glass sponges (Porifera: Hexactinellida) for the purpose of extraction and
examination of the protein matrix,” Russian Journal of Marine Biology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 186–193, 2006.
[17] H. Ehrlich, M. Krautter, T. Hanke, et al., “First evidence of the presence of chitin in skeletons of marine sponges. Part II. Glass sponges (Hexactinellida: Porifera),” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B, vol. 308B, no. 4, pp. 473–483, 2007.
[18] J. Reitner and D. Mehl, “Early Paleozoic diversification of sponges: new data and evidences,” Geologisch Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbrück, vol. 20, pp. 335–347, 1995.
[19] J. P. Botting and N. J. Butterfield, “Reconstructing early sponge relationships by using the Burgess Shale fossil Eiffelia globosa, Walcott,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1554–1559, 2005.
[20] D. F. Travis, C. J. Francois, L. C. Bonar, and M. J. Glimcher, “Comparative studies of the organic matrices of invertebrate mineralized tissues,” Journal of Ultrastructure Research, vol. 18,
no. 5-6, pp. 519–550, 1967.
[21] H. Ehrlich, M. Maldonado, K.-D. Spindler, et al., “First evidence of chitin as a component of the skeletal fibers of marine sponges. Part I. Verongidae (Demospongia: Porifera),” Journal
of Experimental Zoology Part B, vol. 308B, no. 4, pp. 347–356, 2007.
[22] N. Boden, U. Sommer, and K.-D. Spindler, “Demonstration and characterization of chitinases in the Drosophila Kc cell line,” Insect Biochemistry, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 1985.
[23] K. Tabachnik, “Adaptation of the hexactinellid sponges to deep-sea life,” in Fossil and Recent Sponges, J. Reitner and H. Keupp, Eds., pp. 378–386, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991.
[24] H. M. Reiswig and D. Mehl, “Tissue organization of Farrea occa (Porifera, Hexactinellida),” Zoomorphology, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 301–311, 1991.
[25] S. P. Leys, G. O. Mackie, and H. M. Reiswig, “The biology of
glass sponges,” Advances in Marine Biology, vol. 52, pp. 1–145, 2007.
[26] F. E. Schulze, “Hexactinellida,” in Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse
der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer “Valdivia”
1898-1899, C. Chun, Ed., vol. 4, pp. 1–266, Gustav Fischer,
Jena, Germany, 1904.
[27] C. L. De La Rocha, “Silicon isotope fractionation by marine
sponges and the reconstruction of the silicon isotope composition of ancient deep water,” Geology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 423–426, 2003.
[28] J. C. Weaver and D. E. Morse, “Molecular biology of demosponge axial filaments and their roles in biosilicification,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 356–367,
2003.
[29] M. J. Uriz, X. Turon, M. A. Becerro, and G. Agell, “Siliceous
spicules and skeleton frameworks in sponges: origin, diversity,
ultrastructural patterns and biological functions,” Microscopy
Research and Technique, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 279–299, 2003.
[30] A. Einbu, S. N. Naess, A. Elgsaeter, and K. M. Varum, “Solution properties of chitin in alkali,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 2048–2054, 2004.
[31] E. Atkins, “Conformation in polysaccharides and complex carboxydrates,” Journal of Biosciences, vol. 8, no. 1-2, pp. 375–387, 1985.
[32] G. Cárdenas, G. Cabrera, E. Taboada, and S. P. Miranda,
“Chitin characterization by SEM, FFTIR, XRD, and 13 C cross
polarization/mass angle spinning NMR,” Journal of Applied
Polymer Science, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 1876–1885, 2004.
[33] J. Maitan, K. Bilikova, O. Marcovic, et al., “Isolation and characterization of chitin from bumblebee (Bombus terrestris),” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 40, no. 3,
pp. 237–241, 2007.
[34] D. Carlström, “The crystal structure of α-chitin (poly-Nacetyl-D-glucosamine),” Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 669–683, 1957.
[35] K. Bachmed, F. Quilès, M. Wathier, et al., “Use of dancyl Nacethyl glucosamine as substrate for chitin synthetase activities,” Progress Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2523–2529, 2005.
[36] A. Gemperle, Z. Holan, and V. Pokorny, “The Glucan-chitin
complex in saccharomyces cerevisiae. IV. The electron diffraction of crustacean and yeast cell wall chitin,” Biopolymers, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1982.
[37] W. Helbert and J. Sagiyama, “High-resolution electron microscopy on cellulose II and α-chitin single crystals,” Cellulose, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 1998.
[38] M.-M. Giraud-Guille, H. Chanzy, and R. Vuong, “Chitin
crystals in arthropod cuticles revealed by diffraction contrast
transmission electron microscopy,” Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 232–240, 1990.
[39] A. C. Neville, D. A. D. Parry, and J. Woodhead-Galloway, “The
chitin crystallite in arthropod cuticle,” Journal of Cell Science,
vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 1976.
[40] M.-M. Giraud-Guille, “Plywood structure in nature,” Current
Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp.
221–227, 1998.
[41] J. D. Goodrich and W. T. Winter, “α-chitin nanocrystals prepared from shrimp shells and their specific surface area measurement,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 252–257, 2007.
[42] R. Minke and J. Blackwell, “The structure of α-chitin,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 167–181, 1969.
[43] C. E. Bulawa, “Genetics and molecular biology of chitin synthesis in fungi,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 47, pp. 505–534, 1993.
[44] W. Ogasawara, W. Shenton, S. A. Davis, and S. Mann, “Template mineralization of ordered macroporous chitinsilica composites using a cuttlebone-derived organic matrix,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2835–2837, 2000.
[45] M. Brasier, O. Green, and G. Shields, “Edicarian sponge
spicule clusters from southwestern Mongolia and the origins
of the Cambrian fauna,” Geology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 303–306,
1997.
[46] J. Reitner and D. Mehl, “Monophyly of the taxon Porifera,”
Verhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Hamburg,
vol. 36, pp. 5–32, 1996.
[47] Y. A. Shchipunov, T. Y. Karpenko, A. V. Krekoten, and I. V.
Postnova, “Gelling of otherwise nongelable polysaccharides,”
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 287, no. 2, pp. 373–
378, 2005.
[48] Y. Shirosaki, K. Tsuru, S. Hayakawa, et al., “In vitro cytocompatibility of MG63 cells on chitosan-organosiloxane hybrid membranes,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 485–493, 2005.
[49] K. Schwarz, “A bound form of silicon in glycosaminoglycans and polyuronides,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1608–1612, 1973.
[50] M. Darder, M. Colilla, and E. Ruiz-Hitzky, “Biopolymer-clay
nanocomposites based on chitosan intercalated in montmorillonite,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 3774–3780, 2003.
[51] S. S. Ray and M. Bousmina, “Biodegradable polymers and their layered silicate nanocomposites: in greening the 21st century materials world,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 962–1079, 2005.
[52] S. F. Wang, L. Shen, Y. J. Tong, et al., “Biopolymer chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposites: preparation and characterization,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 123–131, 2005.
[53] M. Rinaudo, “Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 603–632, 2006.
[54] J. N. Vournakis, E. R. Pariser, and S. Finkielsztein, “Poly-Nacetyl glucosamine,” US patent no. 5,623,064, 1997.
[55] J. Vournakis, E. R. Pariser, S. Finkielsztein, and M. Helton, “Biocompatible poly-beta-1, 4-N-acetyl glucosamine,” US patent no. 6,686,342, 2004.
[56] Q. K. Kang, C. M. Hill, M. V. Demcheva, J. Vournakis, and Y. H. An, “Poly-N-acetyl glucosamine-SO4 for reparing osteochondral defect in rabbits,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 288-289, pp. 83–86, 2005.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. This page must provide all available authorship information.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse