Jump to content

New State Ice Company v. Liebmann

From Wikisource


New State Ice Company v. Liebmann
George Sutherland
Syllabus

New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262 (1932), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that due process prevented a state legislature from arbitrarily creating restrictions on new businesses only on the claim that their markets affected a public use.

882608New State Ice Company v. Liebmann — SyllabusGeorge Sutherland

United States Supreme Court

285 U.S. 262

New State Ice Company  v.  Liebmann

 Argued: Feb. 19, 1932. --- Decided: March 21, 1932

Messrs. John B. Dudley, of Oklahoma City, Okl., Guy L. Andrews, of McAlester, Okl., and J. H. Everest, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 262-266 intentionally omitted]

Mr. George M. Nicholson, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 266-271 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse