Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume II/Socrates/Book I/Chapter 30

←

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume II/Socrates/Book I
Philip Schaff et al.

Chapter 30

→

169975Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume II/Socrates/Book I — Chapter 30Philip Schaff et al.

Chapter XXX.—Athanasius is found Innocent of what he was accused; his Accusers take to Flight.

Matters having been brought to this issue with regard to Arsenius, the contrivers of this imposture were reduced to perplexity; and Achab,^[1]

who was also called John, one of the principal accusers, having slipped out of court in the tumult, effected his escape. Thus Athanasius cleared himself from this charge, without having recourse to any pleading;^[2]

for he was confident that the sight only of Arsenius alive would confound his calumniators.

Footnotes

↑ In Athanasius’ account (Apol. c. Arian. 65) this man’s name is given as ᾽Αρχαφ(Archaph), which is an Egyptian name; its assonance with the biblical ᾽Αχαάβ may have made the latter a current appellation. John was no doubt his monastic name.
↑ παραγραφή , legal term; γραφή = ‘indictment,’ παραγραφή = ‘demurrer,’ so used by Isocrates, Demosthenes, &c., of the classical authors.

[1] In Athanasius’ account (Apol. c. Arian. 65) this man’s name is given as ᾽Αρχαφ(Archaph), which is an Egyptian name; its assonance with the biblical ᾽Αχαάβ may have made the latter a current appellation. John was no doubt his monastic name.

[2] παραγραφή , legal term; γραφή = ‘indictment,’ παραγραφή = ‘demurrer,’ so used by Isocrates, Demosthenes, &c., of the classical authors.

[1]

[2]