Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume II/Socrates/Book II/Chapter 42
Chapter XLII.—On the Deposition of Macedonius, Eudoxius obtains the Bishopric of Constantinople.
Acacius, Eudoxius, and those at Constantinople who took part with them, became exceedingly anxious that they also on their side might depose some of the opposite party. Now it should be observed that neither of the factions were influenced by religious considerations in making depositions, but by other motives: for although they did not agree respecting the faith, yet the ground of their reciprocal depositions was not error in doctrine. The Acacian party therefore availing themselves of the emperor’s indignation against others, and especially against Macedonius, which he was cherishing and anxious to vent, in the first place deposed Macedonius, both on account of his having occasioned so much slaughter, and also because he had admitted to communion a deacon who had been found guilty of fornication.[1]
They then depose Eleusius bishop of Cyzicus, for having baptized, and afterwards invested with the diaconate, a priest of Hercules at Tyre named Heraclius, who was known to have practiced magic arts.[2]
A like sentence was pronounced against Basil, or Basilas,—as he
was also called,—who had been constituted bishop of Ancyra
instead of Marcellus: the causes assigned for this condemnation were,
that he had unjustly imprisoned a certain individual, loaded him with
chains, and put him to the torture; that he had traduced some persons;
and that he had disturbed the churches of Africa by his epistles.
Dracontius was also deposed, because he had left the Galatian church
for that of Pergamos. Moreover they deposed, on various pretenses,
Neonas bishop of Seleucia, the city in which the Synod had been
convened, Sophronius of Pompeiopolis in Paphlagonia, Elpidius of
Satala, in Macedonia, and Cyril of Jerusalem, and others for various
reasons.